---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/49732/#review141956
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Stephan Erb
On July 7, 2016, 2:30 a.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/49732/#review141352
---
Ship it!
I think - going forward, just TBR to master makes
> On July 7, 2016, 2:33 a.m., John Sirois wrote:
> > I am slightly worried the tests only seem to work after this change ...
> > IIUC Aurora 0.15.0 should work with mesos 0.27.2 (Aurora should work with
> > the mesos its developed against +/- 1).
>
> John Sirois wrote:
> Oh, now I
> On July 7, 2016, 2:33 a.m., John Sirois wrote:
> > I am slightly worried the tests only seem to work after this change ...
> > IIUC Aurora 0.15.0 should work with mesos 0.27.2 (Aurora should work with
> > the mesos its developed against +/- 1).
>
> John Sirois wrote:
> Oh, now I
> On July 7, 2016, 2:33 a.m., John Sirois wrote:
> > I am slightly worried the tests only seem to work after this change ...
> > IIUC Aurora 0.15.0 should work with mesos 0.27.2 (Aurora should work with
> > the mesos its developed against +/- 1).
>
> John Sirois wrote:
> Oh, now I
> On July 7, 2016, 12:41 a.m., Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
> > Pushed this as tbr to origin/0.15.x in favor of speeding up the vote.
> > Feedback is still welcome.
>
> John Sirois wrote:
> Shouldn't this be on master? I discarded my similar fix here after
> having missed this was only on a
> On July 7, 2016, 2:33 a.m., John Sirois wrote:
> > I am slightly worried the tests only seem to work after this change ...
> > IIUC Aurora 0.15.0 should work with mesos 0.27.2 (Aurora should work with
> > the mesos its developed against +/- 1).
>
> John Sirois wrote:
> Oh, now I
> On July 7, 2016, 4:33 a.m., John Sirois wrote:
> > I am slightly worried the tests only seem to work after this change ...
> > IIUC Aurora 0.15.0 should work with mesos 0.27.2 (Aurora should work with
> > the mesos its developed against +/- 1).
>
> John Sirois wrote:
> Oh, now I
> On July 6, 2016, 8:33 p.m., John Sirois wrote:
> > I am slightly worried the tests only seem to work after this change ...
> > IIUC Aurora 0.15.0 should work with mesos 0.27.2 (Aurora should work with
> > the mesos its developed against +/- 1).
Oh, now I understand I think. You used this
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/49732/#review141120
---
Ship it!
I am slightly worried the tests only seem to work
> On July 6, 2016, 6:41 p.m., Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
> > Pushed this as tbr to origin/0.15.x in favor of speeding up the vote.
> > Feedback is still welcome.
Shouldn't this be on master? I discarded my similar fix here after having
missed this was only on a branch:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/49732/#review141112
---
Pushed this as tbr to origin/0.15.x in favor of speeding up the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/49732/
---
(Updated July 7, 2016, 12:30 a.m.)
Review request for Aurora and Stephan Erb.
13 matches
Mail list logo