Re: Review Request 38080: Remove openjdk runtime requirement.
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38080/#review97573 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Bill Farner On Sept. 2, 2015, 4:36 p.m., Kevin Sweeney wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/38080/ > --- > > (Updated Sept. 2, 2015, 4:36 p.m.) > > > Review request for Aurora, Steve Salevan and Bill Farner. > > > Repository: aurora-packaging > > > Description > --- > > Remove openjdk runtime requirement. > > This addresses one of my +0s. > > > Diffs > - > > specs/rpm/aurora.spec a559b42d73a4211891d8c7569ea7ab2a3a6993ae > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38080/diff/ > > > Testing > --- > > Using a clean vagrant environment installed aurora, then installed the oracle > jdk, then uninstalled java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless (that aurora brought in > transitively). RPM didn't complain and when I restarted the scheduler it was > running under the new JVM. > > ``` > [vagrant@localhost ~]$ curl -s http://localhost:8081/vars | grep > 'jvm_prop_java_vendor ' > jvm_prop_java_vendor Oracle Corporation > [vagrant@localhost ~]$ > ``` > > > Thanks, > > Kevin Sweeney > >
Re: Review Request 38080: Remove openjdk runtime requirement.
> On Sept. 2, 2015, 5:08 p.m., Bill Farner wrote: > > Ship It! > > Kevin Sweeney wrote: > procedural question - I see there's a long-running 0.9.x branch - should > I merge this to master then merge this into that branch? More or less, yes - i've been cherry-picking back onto 0.9.x. - Bill --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38080/#review97573 --- On Sept. 2, 2015, 4:36 p.m., Kevin Sweeney wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/38080/ > --- > > (Updated Sept. 2, 2015, 4:36 p.m.) > > > Review request for Aurora, Steve Salevan and Bill Farner. > > > Repository: aurora-packaging > > > Description > --- > > Remove openjdk runtime requirement. > > This addresses one of my +0s. > > > Diffs > - > > specs/rpm/aurora.spec a559b42d73a4211891d8c7569ea7ab2a3a6993ae > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38080/diff/ > > > Testing > --- > > Using a clean vagrant environment installed aurora, then installed the oracle > jdk, then uninstalled java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless (that aurora brought in > transitively). RPM didn't complain and when I restarted the scheduler it was > running under the new JVM. > > ``` > [vagrant@localhost ~]$ curl -s http://localhost:8081/vars | grep > 'jvm_prop_java_vendor ' > jvm_prop_java_vendor Oracle Corporation > [vagrant@localhost ~]$ > ``` > > > Thanks, > > Kevin Sweeney > >
Review Request 38080: Remove openjdk runtime requirement.
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38080/ --- Review request for Aurora, Steve Salevan and Bill Farner. Repository: aurora-packaging Description --- Remove openjdk runtime requirement. This addresses one of my +0s. Diffs - specs/rpm/aurora.spec a559b42d73a4211891d8c7569ea7ab2a3a6993ae Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38080/diff/ Testing --- Using a clean vagrant environment installed aurora, then installed the oracle jdk, then uninstalled java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless (that aurora brought in transitively). RPM didn't complain and when I restarted the scheduler it was running under the new JVM. ``` [vagrant@localhost ~]$ curl -s http://localhost:8081/vars | grep 'jvm_prop_java_vendor ' jvm_prop_java_vendor Oracle Corporation [vagrant@localhost ~]$ ``` Thanks, Kevin Sweeney
Re: Review Request 38080: Remove openjdk runtime requirement.
> On Sept. 2, 2015, 5:08 p.m., Bill Farner wrote: > > Ship It! procedural question - I see there's a long-running 0.9.x branch - should I merge this to master then merge this into that branch? - Kevin --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38080/#review97573 --- On Sept. 2, 2015, 4:36 p.m., Kevin Sweeney wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/38080/ > --- > > (Updated Sept. 2, 2015, 4:36 p.m.) > > > Review request for Aurora, Steve Salevan and Bill Farner. > > > Repository: aurora-packaging > > > Description > --- > > Remove openjdk runtime requirement. > > This addresses one of my +0s. > > > Diffs > - > > specs/rpm/aurora.spec a559b42d73a4211891d8c7569ea7ab2a3a6993ae > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38080/diff/ > > > Testing > --- > > Using a clean vagrant environment installed aurora, then installed the oracle > jdk, then uninstalled java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless (that aurora brought in > transitively). RPM didn't complain and when I restarted the scheduler it was > running under the new JVM. > > ``` > [vagrant@localhost ~]$ curl -s http://localhost:8081/vars | grep > 'jvm_prop_java_vendor ' > jvm_prop_java_vendor Oracle Corporation > [vagrant@localhost ~]$ > ``` > > > Thanks, > > Kevin Sweeney > >
