> On Dec. 27, 2015, 12:32 p.m., Bill Farner wrote:
> > Thanks, this is a great addition! Since i can't use `rbt` to apply this
> > patch, i'll pull it from your branch on github instead. Can you squash
> > that branch to a single commit? I'd like to just cherry-pick your commit
> > to prese
> On Dec. 27, 2015, 9:32 p.m., Bill Farner wrote:
> > Thanks, this is a great addition! Since i can't use `rbt` to apply this
> > patch, i'll pull it from your branch on github instead. Can you squash
> > that branch to a single commit? I'd like to just cherry-pick your commit
> > to preser
> On Dec. 27, 2015, 1:32 p.m., Bill Farner wrote:
> > Thanks, this is a great addition! Since i can't use `rbt` to apply this
> > patch, i'll pull it from your branch on github instead. Can you squash
> > that branch to a single commit? I'd like to just cherry-pick your commit
> > to preser
> On Dec. 27, 2015, 1:32 p.m., Bill Farner wrote:
> > Thanks, this is a great addition! Since i can't use `rbt` to apply this
> > patch, i'll pull it from your branch on github instead. Can you squash
> > that branch to a single commit? I'd like to just cherry-pick your commit
> > to preser
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/41725/#review111932
---
Ship it!
Thanks, this is a great addition! Since i can't use `rbt
> On Dec. 26, 2015, 8:31 a.m., Aurora ReviewBot wrote:
> > This patch does not apply cleanly against master (1ae77d5), do you need to
> > rebase?
> >
> > I will refresh this build result if you post a review containing
> > "@ReviewBot retry"
>
> Stephan Erb wrote:
> The changes are alread
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/41725/#review111908
---
This patch does not apply cleanly against master (1ae77d5), do you
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/41725/
---
(Updated Dec. 26, 2015, 8:52 p.m.)
Review request for Aurora, Jay Buffington an
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/41725/
---
(Updated Dec. 26, 2015, 8:53 p.m.)
Review request for Aurora, Jay Buffington an
> On Dec. 26, 2015, 5:31 p.m., Aurora ReviewBot wrote:
> > This patch does not apply cleanly against master (1ae77d5), do you need to
> > rebase?
> >
> > I will refresh this build result if you post a review containing
> > "@ReviewBot retry"
The changes are already based on the recent master.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/41725/#review111905
---
This patch does not apply cleanly against master (1ae77d5), do you
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/41725/
---
(Updated Dec. 26, 2015, 5:23 p.m.)
Review request for Aurora, Jay Buffington an
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/41725/
---
Review request for Aurora, Jay Buffington and Bill Farner.
Bugs: AURORA-852
13 matches
Mail list logo
