Ping, again? David, Joe? This is a really easy one!
-Mark
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Mark Chu-Carroll mchucarr...@apache.org
wrote:
ping?
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Mark Chu-Carroll
mchucarr...@twopensource.com wrote:
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24042/#review48991
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Maxim Khutornenko
On July 29, 2014, 5:27
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23471/#review48993
---
wickman, ping?
- Bill Farner
On July 22, 2014, 11:28 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23348/#review48994
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Bill Farner
On July 9, 2014, 7:50 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24059/
---
Review request for Aurora, Kevin Sweeney and Maxim Khutornenko.
Bugs:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24059/#review49002
---
Ship it!
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23949/#review49009
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- David Robinson
On July 25, 2014, 8:50 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22944/#review49010
---
This already has two ship its. Mark, do you mind removing yourself
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23949/
---
(Updated July 29, 2014, 2:53 p.m.)
Review request for Aurora, David McLaughlin
On July 29, 2014, 6:52 p.m., David McLaughlin wrote:
This already has two ship its. Mark, do you mind removing yourself and
adding Bill?
FYI - i don't believe Mark will have RB permissions to edit the review. You
can feel free to do the swap and proceed with the commit.
- Bill
On July 29, 2014, 6:18 p.m., Kevin Sweeney wrote:
src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/http/AbortCallback.java, line 27
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24059/diff/1/?file=644660#file644660line27
Since this isn't in a library anymore you should be fine replacing this
with
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24063/
---
Review request for Aurora, Jake Farrell and Bill Farner.
Bugs: AURORA-620
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24063/#review49014
---
build.gradle
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24063/#comment85852
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24063/#review49015
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Bill Farner
On July 29, 2014, 7:14 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22944/
---
(Updated July 29, 2014, 7:19 p.m.)
Review request for Aurora, Kevin Sweeney
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22944/
---
(Updated July 29, 2014, 7:20 p.m.)
Review request for Aurora, Kevin Sweeney
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24062/
---
(Updated July 29, 2014, 8:11 p.m.)
Review request for Aurora and David
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24059/#review49022
---
src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/http/ServletModule.java
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24059/
---
(Updated July 29, 2014, 9:44 p.m.)
Review request for Aurora, Kevin Sweeney
On July 29, 2014, 8:58 p.m., Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/http/ServletModule.java, line 124
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24059/diff/2/?file=644918#file644918line124
I thought you wanted to drop it?
Hah whoops, that happened in a different
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23329/#review49045
---
Reviewers - ping?
- Bill Farner
On July 9, 2014, 9:50 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22457/#review49046
---
Mark - looks like this was committed, reverted, then re-committed.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24077/
---
Review request for Aurora and Bill Farner.
Repository: aurora
Description
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23471/#review49047
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Brian Wickman
On July 22, 2014, 11:28 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24077/#review49048
---
Nevermind, I think pants 0.0.20 is actually broken.
- Brian
On July 29, 2014, 7:36 p.m., Bill Farner wrote:
Mark - looks like this was committed, reverted, then re-committed. If it's
now in, can you please close the review?
Sadly no. It was committed, reverted, recommitted, reverted, rerecommitted,
rerereverted.
Why it fails in the hudson
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24077/
---
(Updated July 29, 2014, 11:50 p.m.)
Review request for Aurora and Bill Farner.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24077/#review49057
---
Is there a changelog anywhere?
- Kevin Sweeney
On July 29, 2014,
On July 29, 2014, 11:54 p.m., Kevin Sweeney wrote:
Is there a changelog anywhere?
yes, as a matter of fact, they started publishing them just a couple releases
ago:
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pantsbuild.pants/0.0.21
- Brian
---
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24078/
---
Review request for Aurora, David McLaughlin, Kevin Sweeney, and Maxim
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24063/#review49076
---
+0, I dont really think that this is necessary and will add
On July 30, 2014, 1:55 a.m., Jake Farrell wrote:
+0, I dont really think that this is necessary and will add overhead
(especially with AURORA-616), thoughts on opening this up on the dev@ list
to a wider discussion?
+1 to hashing this out in a dev@ discussion. I've had a nervous
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23329/#review49084
---
Not sure I understand the motivation here. It's generally best to
33 matches
Mail list logo