> On March 21, 2014, 2:52 p.m., Bill Farner wrote:
> > Jake - do you agree with discarding this in favor of
> > https://reviews.apache.org/r/17750/?
Was waiting on Kevin to commit that and then was going to rebase the other
changes that I did for this against his https://reviews.apache.org/r/1
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17818/#review38101
---
Jake - do you agree with discarding this in favor of
https://review
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17818/#review34224
---
The move into src/test is still a no-go AFAICT, since we currently e
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17818/
---
(Updated Feb. 7, 2014, 1:45 a.m.)
Review request for Aurora, Kevin Sweeney and
> On Feb. 6, 2014, 9:53 p.m., Kevin Sweeney wrote:
> > No ship. AbstractCronIT is used by QuartzCronIT in
> > https://reviews.apache.org/r/17750/
> >
> > Merging AbstractCronIT and QuartzCronIT is on the list of followup TODOs
> > for that review, so this will be mitigated then.
AbstractCronI
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17818/#review33891
---
I'll be out until Monday - I'll have another look then.
- Kevin Swe
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17818/#review33846
---
No ship. AbstractCronIT is used by QuartzCronIT in
https://reviews.
