Re: Review Request 23329: remove embedded jquery

2014-10-23 Thread Aurora ReviewBot
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23329/#review58218 --- This patch does not apply cleanly on master (53f4e73), do you need

Re: Review Request 23329: remove embedded jquery

2014-09-29 Thread Kevin Sweeney
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23329/#review54897 --- Can this be discarded? - Kevin Sweeney On July 9, 2014, 2:50

Re: Review Request 23329: remove embedded jquery

2014-07-30 Thread Jake Farrell
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23329/#review49153 --- ./src/main/python/apache/thermos/observer/http/assets/jquery*

Re: Review Request 23329: remove embedded jquery

2014-07-29 Thread Bill Farner
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23329/#review49045 --- Reviewers - ping? - Bill Farner On July 9, 2014, 9:50 p.m.,

Re: Review Request 23329: remove embedded jquery

2014-07-29 Thread David McLaughlin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23329/#review49084 --- Not sure I understand the motivation here. It's generally best to

Re: Review Request 23329: remove embedded jquery

2014-07-09 Thread David Robinson
On July 8, 2014, 1:18 a.m., Kevin Sweeney wrote: src/main/python/apache/thermos/observer/http/templates/filebrowse.tpl, line 62 https://reviews.apache.org/r/23329/diff/1/?file=625207#file625207line62 -1, this is pretty much unacceptable from a security standpoint - data

Re: Review Request 23329: remove embedded jquery

2014-07-09 Thread David Robinson
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23329/ --- (Updated July 9, 2014, 9:50 p.m.) Review request for Aurora, David McLaughlin

Re: Review Request 23329: remove embedded jquery

2014-07-07 Thread Kevin Sweeney
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23329/#review47428 ---