> On Feb. 6, 2015, 6:52 p.m., Brian Wickman wrote:
> > This is super rad. Thanks for taking this on.
> >
> > Before I do a deeper dive, what do you think about making the logrotate
> > policy be specified by the user instead of the framework owner, with a
> > sensible default? For example, i
> On Feb. 6, 2015, 6:52 p.m., Brian Wickman wrote:
> > This is super rad. Thanks for taking this on.
> >
> > Before I do a deeper dive, what do you think about making the logrotate
> > policy be specified by the user instead of the framework owner, with a
> > sensible default? For example, i
> On Feb. 6, 2015, 6:52 p.m., Brian Wickman wrote:
> > This is super rad. Thanks for taking this on.
> >
> > Before I do a deeper dive, what do you think about making the logrotate
> > policy be specified by the user instead of the framework owner, with a
> > sensible default? For example, i
> On Feb. 6, 2015, 6:52 p.m., Brian Wickman wrote:
> > This is super rad. Thanks for taking this on.
> >
> > Before I do a deeper dive, what do you think about making the logrotate
> > policy be specified by the user instead of the framework owner, with a
> > sensible default? For example, i
> On Feb. 6, 2015, 6:52 p.m., Brian Wickman wrote:
> > This is super rad. Thanks for taking this on.
> >
> > Before I do a deeper dive, what do you think about making the logrotate
> > policy be specified by the user instead of the framework owner, with a
> > sensible default? For example, i
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30695/#review71472
---
This is super rad. Thanks for taking this on.
Before I do a deeper
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30695/#review71459
---
Ship it!
Master (5059040) is green with this patch.
./build-suppo
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30695/
---
(Updated Feb. 6, 2015, 5:51 p.m.)
Review request for Aurora, Bill Farner and Br
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30695/#review71447
---
This patch does not apply cleanly on master (5059040), do you need t
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30695/
---
(Updated Feb. 6, 2015, 5:14 p.m.)
Review request for Aurora, Bill Farner and Br
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30695/#review71335
---
Master (1c78721) is red with this patch.
./build-support/jenkins/b
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30695/#review71331
---
@ReviewBot retry
- George Sirois
On Feb. 5, 2015, 10:32 p.m., Geo
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30695/#review71329
---
Master (1c78721) is red with this patch.
./build-support/jenkins/b
13 matches
Mail list logo
