Re: Review Request 18484: Count on task timeouts and task pruning to be idempotent, simplifying handling code.

2014-03-06 Thread Bill Farner


 On March 6, 2014, 6:56 p.m., Suman Karumuri wrote:
  src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/HistoryPrunerTest.java, 
  line 377
  https://reviews.apache.org/r/18484/diff/1/?file=503796#file503796line377
 
  This function can be replaced by Tasks.SCHEDULED_TO_JOB_KEY

Thanks, fixed.


- Bill


---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18484/#review36397
---


On Feb. 25, 2014, 10:25 p.m., Bill Farner wrote:
 
 ---
 This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
 https://reviews.apache.org/r/18484/
 ---
 
 (Updated Feb. 25, 2014, 10:25 p.m.)
 
 
 Review request for Aurora, Kevin Sweeney and Suman Karumuri.
 
 
 Repository: aurora
 
 
 Description
 ---
 
 These async operations already took provisions to be idempotent, but still 
 had additional code to keep track of and clean up work made irrelevant.
 
 In this change, we explicitly lean on the fact that the operations are 
 idempotent, and allow things like a task timeout to fire but no-op for a task 
 that successfully made it out of a transient state.
 
 More details on specific changes:
 - HistoryPruner used to maintain a mapping from job key to task ID.  
 Addressed TODO to use storage instead.
 - Removed collection of outstanding tasks in transient states.  This was 
 useful when vetting the feature, but is no longer used in practice.
 - Attempted to make HistoryPrunerTest more readable.
 
 
 Diffs
 -
 
   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/HistoryPruner.java 
 c80c000ddb5627e9d753bd59e77231e3050470e5 
   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/TaskTimeout.java 
 82b483b019639e6d1013f834ea047827cb171fa6 
   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/HistoryPrunerTest.java 
 811f68c792ce8eb3f687f249307612c90091ad59 
   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/TaskTimeoutTest.java 
 71d6a9ed943306386dfe88074ee07f69f6ca15d1 
 
 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18484/diff/
 
 
 Testing
 ---
 
 ./gradlew build
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Bill Farner
 




Re: Review Request 18484: Count on task timeouts and task pruning to be idempotent, simplifying handling code.

2014-03-06 Thread Bill Farner

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18484/
---

(Updated March 7, 2014, 12:22 a.m.)


Review request for Aurora, Kevin Sweeney and Suman Karumuri.


Repository: aurora


Description
---

These async operations already took provisions to be idempotent, but still had 
additional code to keep track of and clean up work made irrelevant.

In this change, we explicitly lean on the fact that the operations are 
idempotent, and allow things like a task timeout to fire but no-op for a task 
that successfully made it out of a transient state.

More details on specific changes:
- HistoryPruner used to maintain a mapping from job key to task ID.  Addressed 
TODO to use storage instead.
- Removed collection of outstanding tasks in transient states.  This was useful 
when vetting the feature, but is no longer used in practice.
- Attempted to make HistoryPrunerTest more readable.


Diffs (updated)
-

  src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/HistoryPruner.java 
c80c000ddb5627e9d753bd59e77231e3050470e5 
  src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/TaskTimeout.java 
82b483b019639e6d1013f834ea047827cb171fa6 
  src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/HistoryPrunerTest.java 
811f68c792ce8eb3f687f249307612c90091ad59 
  src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/TaskTimeoutTest.java 
71d6a9ed943306386dfe88074ee07f69f6ca15d1 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18484/diff/


Testing
---

./gradlew build


Thanks,

Bill Farner



Re: Review Request 18484: Count on task timeouts and task pruning to be idempotent, simplifying handling code.

2014-03-03 Thread Bill Farner

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18484/#review35983
---


Ping?  Suman — waiting on a review from you.

- Bill Farner


On Feb. 25, 2014, 10:25 p.m., Bill Farner wrote:
 
 ---
 This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
 https://reviews.apache.org/r/18484/
 ---
 
 (Updated Feb. 25, 2014, 10:25 p.m.)
 
 
 Review request for Aurora, Kevin Sweeney and Suman Karumuri.
 
 
 Repository: aurora
 
 
 Description
 ---
 
 These async operations already took provisions to be idempotent, but still 
 had additional code to keep track of and clean up work made irrelevant.
 
 In this change, we explicitly lean on the fact that the operations are 
 idempotent, and allow things like a task timeout to fire but no-op for a task 
 that successfully made it out of a transient state.
 
 More details on specific changes:
 - HistoryPruner used to maintain a mapping from job key to task ID.  
 Addressed TODO to use storage instead.
 - Removed collection of outstanding tasks in transient states.  This was 
 useful when vetting the feature, but is no longer used in practice.
 - Attempted to make HistoryPrunerTest more readable.
 
 
 Diffs
 -
 
   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/HistoryPruner.java 
 c80c000ddb5627e9d753bd59e77231e3050470e5 
   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/TaskTimeout.java 
 82b483b019639e6d1013f834ea047827cb171fa6 
   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/HistoryPrunerTest.java 
 811f68c792ce8eb3f687f249307612c90091ad59 
   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/TaskTimeoutTest.java 
 71d6a9ed943306386dfe88074ee07f69f6ca15d1 
 
 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18484/diff/
 
 
 Testing
 ---
 
 ./gradlew build
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Bill Farner