Re: Review Request 32198: Added a not equal operator for json objects.

2015-05-07 Thread Alexander Rojas
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32198/ --- (Updated May 7, 2015, 9:09 p.m.) Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman,

Re: Review Request 32198: Added a not equal operator for json objects.

2015-05-07 Thread Joerg Schad
On May 7, 2015, 8:07 p.m., Joerg Schad wrote: configure.ac, line 566 https://reviews.apache.org/r/32198/diff/7/?file=952552#file952552line566 How is this related to your change? Looking at the review history could it be that this was added by mistake? - Joerg

Re: Review Request 32198: Added a not equal operator for json objects.

2015-05-07 Thread Alexander Rojas
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32198/ --- (Updated May 7, 2015, 10:37 p.m.) Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman,

Re: Review Request 32198: Added a not equal operator for json objects.

2015-05-04 Thread Niklas Nielsen
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32198/#review82407 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Niklas Nielsen On May 1, 2015, 11:55 a.m.,

Re: Review Request 32198: Added a not equal operator for json objects.

2015-05-01 Thread Alexander Rojas
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32198/ --- (Updated May 1, 2015, 8:55 p.m.) Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman,

Re: Review Request 32198: Added a not equal operator for json objects.

2015-04-29 Thread Alexander Rojas
On April 20, 2015, 5:18 p.m., Niklas Nielsen wrote: 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/tests/json_tests.cpp, line 258 https://reviews.apache.org/r/32198/diff/3/?file=903041#file903041line258 How about also checking for a larger array? Alexander Rojas wrote: What can be

Re: Review Request 32198: Added a not equal operator for json objects.

2015-04-29 Thread Till Toenshoff
On April 20, 2015, 3:18 p.m., Niklas Nielsen wrote: 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/tests/json_tests.cpp, line 258 https://reviews.apache.org/r/32198/diff/3/?file=903041#file903041line258 How about also checking for a larger array? Alexander Rojas wrote: What can be