---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34980/
---
(Updated June 3, 2015, 9:16 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Jie Yu, Niklas
On June 3, 2015, 9:06 p.m., Niklas Nielsen wrote:
Do you want to add a test to verify that this works? :)
Definitely will do that in next patch (:
- Bartek
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34980/#review86497
---
src/slave/resource_estimators/noop.cpp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34980/
---
(Updated June 4, 2015, 12:08 a.m.)
Review request for mesos, Jie Yu, Niklas
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34980/
---
(Updated June 3, 2015, 10:21 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Jie Yu, Niklas
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34980/#review86366
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [34962, 34980]
All tests
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34980/#review86441
---
src/slave/slave.cpp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34980/#review86362
---
Any idea why review requests failed to show diff of noop.hpp?
I
On June 3, 2015, 5:58 a.m., Bartek Plotka wrote:
Any idea why review requests failed to show diff of noop.hpp?
I guess it something with
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34962/diff/#file976910, since this patch
depends on that.
reviewboard*
- Bartek
