On July 2, 2015, 11:44 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
src/linux/perf.cpp, line 496
https://reviews.apache.org/r/36114/diff/2/?file=998617#file998617line496
Sorry for the drive-by comment, but why not just have a single
'extract' that based on the 'Version' performs the necessary
On July 2, 2015, 12:52 a.m., Paul Brett wrote:
src/linux/perf.cpp, line 473
https://reviews.apache.org/r/36114/diff/1/?file=997704#file997704line473
How about extract_post_linux_2_6_39 for the name?
I wanted it that too, but functions names need to be lowerCamerl per style
guide.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/36114/#review90294
---
src/linux/perf.cpp (line 496)
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/36114/
---
(Updated July 2, 2015, 11:40 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Ian Downes, Paul
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/36114/#review90170
---
src/linux/perf.cpp (line 473)
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/36114/#review90180
---
src/linux/perf.cpp (line 473)
