---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/41026/#review111657
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Joris Van Remoortere
On Dec. 18, 2015,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/41026/
---
(Updated Dec. 18, 2015, 11:53 p.m.)
Review request for mesos and Joris Van
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/41026/
---
(Updated Dec. 18, 2015, 11:51 p.m.)
Review request for mesos and Joris Van
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/41026/#review111295
---
3rdparty/libprocess/src/libevent_ssl_socket.cpp (lines 225 - 226)
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/41026/#review109294
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [41026]
Passed command:
> On Dec. 8, 2015, 1:43 a.m., Joseph Wu wrote:
> > Would it be plausible to write a repro/test (in the libprocess level) for
> > this?
> >
> > Presumably, we should be able to write a process that does a "long running
> > streaming download" (which causes the bug, according to your
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/41026/#review109226
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [41026]
Passed command:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/41026/
---
(Updated Dec. 8, 2015, 1:22 a.m.)
Review request for mesos and Joris Van
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/41026/#review109246
---
Would it be plausible to write a repro/test (in the libprocess
