-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/43850/#review120196
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/tests/containerizer/memory_pressure_tests.cpp (line 231)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/43850/#comment181621>

    Maybe rename this to runningStatus?



src/tests/containerizer/memory_pressure_tests.cpp (line 292)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/43850/#comment181623>

    Do we still need this at this point?


- Joerg Schad


On Feb. 22, 2016, 9:12 p.m., Alexander Rojas wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/43850/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 22, 2016, 9:12 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Bernd Mathiske and Joseph Wu.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Sometimes MemoryPressureMesosTest.CGROUPS_ROOT_SlaveRecovery will fail because
> the tracker of the cgroups pressure counter is not finished by the time the
> expectations are set.
> 
> This patch ensures that the killed status has arrived before checking for the
> pressure values.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/containerizer/memory_pressure_tests.cpp 
> 4a03af2c9c0643d964b1d76e2096341b59bf5dce 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/43850/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> On a CentOS 6.7 virtual box machine:
> 
> ```bash
> MESOS_VERBOSE=1 sudo .libs/mesos-tests 
> --gtest_filter="MemoryPressureMesosTest.CGROUPS_ROOT_SlaveRecovery" 
> --gtest_repeat=300 --gtest_break_on_failure
> ```
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexander Rojas
> 
>

Reply via email to