-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/45203/#review128021
-----------------------------------------------------------



This test looks fine, but what about testing the positive case? In a previous 
version of another patch, you replaced `checkWithRolesEndpoint` with a version 
that used GET on /weights. Can you revive that so we can make sure we're 
testing that a successful request returns the expected response?


src/tests/dynamic_weights_tests.cpp (line 520)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/45203/#comment191419>

    s/response1/response/


- Adam B


On March 23, 2016, 1:53 a.m., Yongqiao Wang wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/45203/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 23, 2016, 1:53 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Adam B.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-4316
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4316
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Add authentication  test for /weights GET request.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/dynamic_weights_tests.cpp 
> ee0c4b1cc20e76a35a8e4e445f6827a1fc33e6c6 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/45203/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make && make check.
> 
> $ ./src/mesos-tests 
> --gtest_filter=DynamicWeightsTest.UnauthenticatedQueryWeightRequest
> [==========] Running 1 test from 1 test case.
> [----------] Global test environment set-up.
> [----------] 1 test from DynamicWeightsTest
> [ RUN      ] DynamicWeightsTest.UnauthenticatedQueryWeightRequest
> [       OK ] DynamicWeightsTest.UnauthenticatedQueryWeightRequest (81 ms)
> [----------] 1 test from DynamicWeightsTest (81 ms total)
> 
> [----------] Global test environment tear-down
> [==========] 1 test from 1 test case ran. (91 ms total)
> [  PASSED  ] 1 test.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Yongqiao Wang
> 
>

Reply via email to