Re: Review Request 65160: Removed some redundant `get` calls in stout.

2018-02-21 Thread Benjamin Bannier
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65160/ --- (Updated Feb. 21, 2018, 2:31 p.m.) Review request for mesos, Andrew

Re: Review Request 65160: Removed some redundant `get` calls in stout.

2018-02-12 Thread Benjamin Bannier
> On Feb. 12, 2018, 8:12 p.m., Andrew Schwartzmeyer wrote: > > I noticed that this didn't apply the automated reviewer to any Windows-only > > files. On the one hand, I have clean-up patches in progress that would be > > no fun to rebase afterward, on the other hand, why were those files > >

Re: Review Request 65160: Removed some redundant `get` calls in stout.

2018-02-12 Thread Andrew Schwartzmeyer
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65160/#review197291 --- Ship it! I noticed that this didn't apply the automated

Re: Review Request 65160: Removed some redundant `get` calls in stout.

2018-02-12 Thread Benjamin Bannier
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65160/ --- (Updated Feb. 12, 2018, 3:07 p.m.) Review request for mesos, Andrew