On June 29, 2015, 7:40 p.m., Jie Yu wrote:
Thanks Joerg! See my detailed comments. I suggest you take a look at the
discussion in https://reviews.apache.org/r/34720/ first.
Hi Joerg, I am wondering if you are still working on this ticket? Some of our
internal framework developers noticed
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35927/
---
(Updated June 29, 2015, 7:22 a.m.)
Review request for mesos and Alexander
On June 28, 2015, 8:57 a.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
include/mesos/containerizer/containerizer.proto, lines 87-89
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35927/diff/1/?file=993029#file993029line87
Why do we need a deprecation cycle for this? AFAIK, it's part of the
containerizer API only
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35927/#review89717
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [35927]
All tests passed.
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35927/#review89779
---
Thanks Joerg! See my detailed comments. I suggest you take a look
On June 28, 2015, 8:57 a.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
include/mesos/slave/isolator.hpp, line 64
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35927/diff/1/?file=993031#file993031line64
AFAIK, techinally, limitation does not necessarily end in termination,
though it is so for
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35927/#review89667
---
include/mesos/containerizer/containerizer.proto (lines 87 - 89)
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35927/
---
Review request for mesos and Alexander Rukletsov.
Bugs: MESOS-2035
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35927/#review89518
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [35927]
All tests passed.
-
