Re: Review Request 36610: Add explicit syscall header file to linux fs

2017-03-01 Thread Joris Van Remoortere
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/36610/#review167320 --- Closing this review due to inactivity. Please see our

Re: Review Request 36610: Add explicit syscall header file to linux fs

2016-05-24 Thread Tomasz Janiszewski
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/36610/#review134588 --- Is this patch still valid? Take a look at

Re: Review Request 36610: Add explicit syscall header file to linux fs

2015-12-07 Thread Zhiwei Chen
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/36610/#review109255 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Zhiwei Chen On July 20, 2015, 12:21 p.m.,

Re: Review Request 36610: Add explicit syscall header file to linux fs

2015-12-07 Thread Cong Wang
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/36610/#review109277 --- Isn't SYS_xxx in sys/syscall.h instead of syscall.h? - Cong Wang

Re: Review Request 36610: Add explicit syscall header file to linux fs

2015-07-20 Thread Mesos ReviewBot
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/36610/#review92367 --- Patch looks great! Reviews applied: [36610] All tests passed. -

Review Request 36610: Add explicit syscall header file to linux fs

2015-07-19 Thread Jihun Kang
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/36610/ --- Review request for mesos. Bugs: MESOS-3085