> On March 31, 2016, 5:59 p.m., Cong Wang wrote:
> > Why /var/run/netns could be in the same mount peer group with its parent?
> > At least on fedora21 this is not the case.
> >
> > Also, why do you fix two bugs in one patch? I know you don't care about
> > bisect, but even so this is still
> On March 31, 2016, 5:59 p.m., Cong Wang wrote:
> > Why /var/run/netns could be in the same mount peer group with its parent?
> > At least on fedora21 this is not the case.
> >
> > Also, why do you fix two bugs in one patch? I know you don't care about
> > bisect, but even so this is still
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/45520/#review126372
---
Why /var/run/netns could be in the same mount peer group with its
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/45520/#review126259
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [45520]
Passed command:
