---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/46923/#review133000
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [46923]
Passed command:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/46923/#review132958
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Vinod Kone
On May 11, 2016, 3:47 a.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/46923/
---
(Updated May 11, 2016, 3:47 a.m.)
Review request for mesos, Guangya Liu, Kevin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/46923/#review132571
---
src/master/master.hpp (line 929)
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/46923/#review132092
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [46923]
Passed command:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/46923/
---
(Updated May 6, 2016, 12:09 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Guangya Liu, Kevin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/46923/#review132017
---
src/master/master.cpp (line 1387)
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/46923/
---
(Updated May 6, 2016, 12:03 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Guangya Liu, Kevin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/46923/#review132003
---
Fix it, then Ship it!
src/master/master.cpp (line 1386)
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/46923/#review131988
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [46923]
Passed command:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/46923/
---
(Updated May 6, 2016, 3:18 a.m.)
Review request for mesos, Guangya Liu, Kevin
> On May 4, 2016, 7:35 a.m., Neil Conway wrote:
> > I notice that `Master::_exited` also checks that the `failover_timeout` is
> > valid. Do you think it would be better to simplify that logic to assume
> > that the `failover_timeout` is always valid? i.e., add a `CHECK` that it is
> > valid
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/46923/#review131635
---
I notice that `Master::_exited` also checks that the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/46923/#review131610
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [46923]
Passed command:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/46923/
---
(Updated May 4, 2016, 12:31 a.m.)
Review request for mesos, Kevin Sweeney and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/46923/
---
(Updated May 4, 2016, 12:27 a.m.)
Review request for mesos, Kevin Sweeney and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/46923/#review131489
---
You can put `MESOS-1575` to the `bugs` column at right.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/46923/#review131485
---
src/master/master.hpp (line 937)
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/46923/#review131467
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [46923]
Passed command:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/46923/
---
Review request for mesos.
Repository: mesos
Description
---
Frameworks
20 matches
Mail list logo