---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/52192/#review156783
---
This change should be replaced by these two:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/52192/
---
(Updated Nov. 23, 2016, 5:13 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Alex Naparu,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/52192/
---
(Updated Nov. 14, 2016, 5:47 a.m.)
Review request for mesos, Alex Naparu,
> On Sept. 23, 2016, 6:42 p.m., Joseph Wu wrote:
> > It's a bit odd that this function signature has a double. We should
> > investigate why and decided whether or not we should change the interface
> > to `uint64_t`.
I double checked where we use the multiplication/division operators for
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/52192/
---
(Updated Sept. 29, 2016, 4:33 a.m.)
Review request for mesos, Alex Clemmer and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/52192/#review150283
---
It's a bit odd that this function signature has a double. We
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/52192/
---
Review request for mesos, Alex Clemmer and Joseph Wu.
Repository: mesos
