Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15202
Please separate these as two pull requests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user hhbyyh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15179
Sorry, I meant unit test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15202
**[Test build #65790 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65790/consoleFull)**
for PR 15202 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15202
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14359
Thanks @hhbyyh and @sethah !
I agree that a later PR could be more careful about which trees are
completed in which order and test this more thoroughly. But I hope this takes
us 80% of
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15205
To reviewers: This code was taken and modified from [#14112].
@GayathriMurali should be the primary author when we merge this into branch-2.0
I'll merge this once tests pass.
---
If
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15206
**[Test build #65801 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65801/consoleFull)**
for PR 15206 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15202
@rxin this one just added the unit test of #15153 into branch 2.0 +
#15122. Do you still insist on separating them?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user brkyvz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15206
@zsxwing Will this break streaming jobs if someone upgrades their Spark
version, since they won't be able to deserialize the class correctly?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user koeninger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102
@tdas moving this conversation back to the PR that's linked from the public
jira
> yeah, i am trying to figure out all the options and write up something to
so that we are clear on the
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090#discussion_r80161814
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/Statistics.scala
---
@@ -32,19 +34,74 @@ package
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65793/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14971
**[Test build #65795 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65795/consoleFull)**
for PR 14971 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14971
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15206
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65803/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user brkyvz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15202
@rxin The only change that was needed was:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15202/files#diff-e82a44dc550d2a0a92e44d1ec2ecabccR137
Which was equivalent to the two master branch changes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10212
**[Test build #65787 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65787/consoleFull)**
for PR 10212 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15202
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65790/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14971
**[Test build #65795 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65795/consoleFull)**
for PR 14971 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15203
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15206
**[Test build #65803 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65803/consoleFull)**
for PR 15206 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14659
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65799/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14659
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15204
**[Test build #65808 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65808/consoleFull)**
for PR 15204 at commit
Github user koeninger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102
> I agree that if/when we add that ability to add existing partitions
midstream we'd probably need to add two offsets in to the SQL offset for new
partitions.
It's not just existing
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15179
Accepting more input types SGTM too (with unit tests). The PR title and
description (and perhaps the JIRA too) should be updated. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9766
Rebase the PR, @davies @JoshRosen Could you help to review it ? Thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14359
LGTM pending tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15206
/cc @jerryshao
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15206
[SPARK-17640][SQL]Avoid using -1 as the default batchId for
FileStreamSource.FileEntry
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Avoid using -1 as the default batchId for
Github user Sherry302 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14659#discussion_r80161383
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/Task.scala ---
@@ -54,7 +54,10 @@ private[spark] abstract class Task[T](
val partitionId:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15205
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65800/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15205
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15205
**[Test build #65800 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65800/consoleFull)**
for PR 15205 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14359
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65798/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14359
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14359
**[Test build #65798 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65798/consoleFull)**
for PR 14359 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10212#discussion_r80165121
--- Diff:
core/src/test/resources/HistoryServerExpectations/complete_stage_list_json_expectation.json
---
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
"numCompleteTasks" : 8,
Github user koeninger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102
> For streaming you already know what the global order is, because you know
when you asked for A and B. I agree that we should probably remove the
comparable requirement from Offset in favor of
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10212#discussion_r80165213
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/util/JsonProtocolSuite.scala
---
@@ -1097,7 +1100,9 @@ private[spark] object JsonProtocolSuite extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14971
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65795/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14971
**[Test build #65796 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65796/consoleFull)**
for PR 14971 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14971
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65796/
Test PASSed.
---
GitHub user marmbrus opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15207
[SPARK-17643] Remove comparable requirement from Offset
For some sources, it is difficult to provide a global ordering based only
on the data in the offset. Since we don't use comparison for
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14971
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65783/
Test PASSed.
---
GitHub user brkyvz opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15203
[TEST][SPARK-17569] Make the unit test added for SPARK-17569 work again
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
A
Github user brkyvz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15203
cc @zsxwing
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079
@kayousterhout @tgravescs sorry for the long delay from me. I've addressed
most the feedback. But I haven't looked at separating out the blacklist logic
into a separate class inside TaskSetManager
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090
**[Test build #65793 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65793/consoleFull)**
for PR 15090 at commit
GitHub user vanzin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15204
[SPARK-17639][build] Add jce.jar to buildclasspath when building.
This was missing, preventing code that uses javax.crypto to properly
compile in Spark.
You can merge this pull request into a
Github user jisookim0513 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10212#discussion_r80156532
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/JsonProtocol.scala ---
@@ -759,7 +761,15 @@ private[spark] object JsonProtocol {
return
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090#discussion_r80156525
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/Statistics.scala
---
@@ -32,19 +34,74 @@ package
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15034
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15206
> @zsxwing Will this break streaming jobs if someone upgrades their Spark
version, since they won't be able to deserialize the class correctly?
@brkyvz No. This doesn't change the file
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15206
@brkyvz right now we cannot support upgrading anyway since the execution
metadata uses Java serialization.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15199
This was introduced by https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14176. It
should not affect Branch-2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15206
LGTM, thanks for the fix.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user marmbrus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102
Comparable requirement removed in #15207.
> I think in the absence of prior information about the position in a
topicpartition, you start a new batch on topic B starting from wherever the
Github user koeninger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102
@tdas I think as long as marmbrus' PR to remove comparable from the
interface works for sane variations of subscription changes it's the best way
to go. I'm honestly fine with someone getting
Github user gatorsmile closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15174
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14659
**[Test build #65799 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65799/consoleFull)**
for PR 14659 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15174
Let me close it. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15041
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user yucai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15199
Thanks all, it should be fixed in master only, my mistake.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15041
**[Test build #65809 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65809/consoleFull)**
for PR 15041 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15041
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65809/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15089#discussion_r80174300
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/python/RowQueue.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,278 @@
+/*
+* Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15204
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65802/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15204
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15204
**[Test build #65794 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65794/consoleFull)**
for PR 15204 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15205
**[Test build #65800 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65800/consoleFull)**
for PR 15205 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15202
OK that's fine. Merging in. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15204
**[Test build #65802 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65802/consoleFull)**
for PR 15204 at commit
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090#discussion_r80165466
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/Statistics.scala
---
@@ -32,19 +34,74 @@ package
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15206
**[Test build #65801 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65801/consoleFull)**
for PR 15206 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15204
**[Test build #65802 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65802/consoleFull)**
for PR 15204 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15199
**[Test build #65788 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65788/consoleFull)**
for PR 15199 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15034
**[Test build #65789 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65789/consoleFull)**
for PR 15034 at commit
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15034
I'll go ahead and merge this. Thanks @hhbyyh for reviewing it!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14359
**[Test build #65798 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65798/consoleFull)**
for PR 14359 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15203
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15203
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65792/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15199
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9766
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65797/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9766
**[Test build #65797 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65797/consoleFull)**
for PR 9766 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9766
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15208
**[Test build #65806 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65806/consoleFull)**
for PR 15208 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15203
**[Test build #65792 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65792/consoleFull)**
for PR 15203 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13458
**[Test build #3288 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3288/consoleFull)**
for PR 13458 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102#discussion_r80154723
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSource.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,474 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9766
**[Test build #65797 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65797/consoleFull)**
for PR 9766 at commit
Github user jisookim0513 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10212#discussion_r80156386
--- Diff:
core/src/test/resources/HistoryServerExpectations/complete_stage_list_json_expectation.json
---
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
"numCompleteTasks" :
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15203
LGTM. Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15203
**[Test build #65792 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65792/consoleFull)**
for PR 15203 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090
**[Test build #65793 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65793/consoleFull)**
for PR 15090 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15205
**[Test build #65804 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65804/consoleFull)**
for PR 15205 at commit
Github user marmbrus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102
> "I want to be able to add a topicpartition mid stream, but I don't want
to start it from the beginning."
I see, I was thinking only of new topics that appear that match your
pattern. I
1 - 100 of 469 matches
Mail list logo