Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18828
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18828#discussion_r147544081
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkPlanSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18828#discussion_r131529489
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkPlanSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18828#discussion_r131250896
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/QueryPlan.scala
---
@@ -181,17 +181,38 @@ abstract class QueryPlan[PlanType <:
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18828
[SPARK-21619][SQL] Fail the execution of canonicalized plans explicitly
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Canonicalized plans are not supposed to be executed. I ran into a case
