Re: [rhelv5-list] Persistent naming for eth devices

2008-03-18 Thread Matthias Saou
Luke S Crawford wrote : Matthias Saou [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ...slighty OT, but worth mentioning ;-) Now the other problem I'm having is to get Xen to use VLAN interfaces on top of the bonded interfaces... not working as expected either yet, and the Xen network scripts don't make

Re: [rhelv5-list] Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.2 Beta Announcement

2008-03-18 Thread Jerry Cooperstein
Bill Watson wrote: While Red Hat is having fun with 5.2, is there any thought to supplying the 32 bit Firefox on the 64 bit systems as a default install? There is no flash upgrade and who knows what all else for the 64 bit version, where the 32 bit version seems well supported. The only path I

Re: [rhelv5-list] Persistent naming for eth devices

2008-03-18 Thread Kaj Niemi
Hi, Regarding xen's network scripts not playing nicely with vlans, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=337651 I worked around the problem by doing the following: 1. Set (network-script /bin/true) in xend-config.sxp 2. Create xenbr interfaces through the use of ifcfg-xenbrX %

[rhelv5-list] sendmail smart host help

2008-03-18 Thread Marthinus
I need some help with sendmail My problem is that sendmail just sends out all email to the SMTP smart host without even consulting the aliases file, even if it is for a local account. Firstly sendmail is the default one as in a default install I modified the aliases file to send all of root's

RE: [rhelv5-list] Hardening RHEL5

2008-03-18 Thread Bill Watson
Why couldn't someone generate a reverse lookup table for encoded passwords? While you may not have a list large enough to support every possible combo, you'd most likely catch a percentage. 34 bytes of scramble using 100 bytes of letters is 34^100. At a storage of 10bytes per crypt, that's only

Re: [rhelv5-list] Hardening RHEL5

2008-03-18 Thread John Summerfield
Stephen John Smoogen wrote: For my scale of system, network bandwidth is a limiting factor, especially as I limit sensitive network connexions (for us it's only ssh) to five per hour from most of the world. Then you would need to make a password changing policy to meet that scale. Which

Re: [rhelv5-list] Hardening RHEL5

2008-03-18 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 6:43 PM, John Summerfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stephen John Smoogen wrote: For my scale of system, network bandwidth is a limiting factor, especially as I limit sensitive network connexions (for us it's only ssh) to five per hour from most of the world.