Sorry for battering the list with a host of questions in a short
period of time, but I am new to Rhino Mocks (like yesterday) and
absolutely loving it! Unfortunately, the only documentation I have
found (http://ayende.com/Wiki/Rhino+Mocks+3.5.ashx) does not answer
all my questions!
I want to be a
ould also write using Lain's example:
>
> mockObj.Expect(x=>x.SomeMethod()).Repeat.Time(3))
>
> (just depends on how you prefer things).
>
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Colin Desmond <
>
> colin.desm...@btopenworld.com> wrote:
>
> > Excellent, thanks t
Excellent, thanks this worked just fine.
Colin.
On Jan 21, 2:28 pm, Tim Barcz wrote:
> var mockObj = MockRepository.GenerateMock();
>
> ...
>
> mockObj.AssertWasCalled(x=>x.SomeMethod(), o=>o.Repeat.Times(3));
>
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Col
I want to check that a particular method is called 3 times on a single
mocked instance, is there a way of expressing this in Rhino Mocks 3.5?
In particular, if it is only called twice, I want the test to fail.
Many thanks
Colin
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received t
Excellent, thank you Phil.
Colin
On Jan 19, 3:52 pm, Phil wrote:
> try: m_contactPresenter.ContactAdapter.AssertWasCalled(a => a.Names =
> null);
>
> On Jan 19, 3:03 am, Colin Desmond
> wrote:
>
> > In the fluent syntax is it possible to test whether a set only
&
OK, I am happy with that as a solution.
Colin.
On Jan 19, 12:45 pm, Ayende Rahien wrote:
> The issue is a problem with modopt in the CLR.Since it is the same thing
> from your perspective, please use int
>
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 5:24 AM, Colin Desmond <
>
> colin.de
In the fluent syntax is it possible to test whether a set only
property (not get method defined) is called. I am not too bothered
about the parameters being passed.
So far I have tried:
m_contactPresenter.ContactAdapter.AssertWasCalled(a => a.Names);
and
Expect.Call
(m_contactPresenter.Contact
.Int32!
Colin
On Jan 19, 9:32 am, Colin Desmond
wrote:
> We're using 3.5 SP1.
>
> When I rewrite the interface as C# it is happy. I'll try playing with
> the C++/CLI syntax a little and see if I can get it to work.
>
> Colin
>
> On Jan 18, 9:15 pm, Ayende Rahien
We're using 3.5 SP1.
When I rewrite the interface as C# it is happy. I'll try playing with
the C++/CLI syntax a little and see if I can get it to work.
Colin
On Jan 18, 9:15 pm, Ayende Rahien wrote:
> what version of the runtime?if you write the same thing in C#, does it cause
> any issues?
>