Hi Spiro,
The keys are generated by Riak CS and stored in the database. You'll want
to use the Riak CS generated ones.
--
Luke Bakken
CSE
lbak...@basho.com
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Spiro N
wrote:
> Hello, I love the idea of an s3 alternative and was wondering if there was
> anyway to
Good to know.
Many thanks, Luke.
Lloyd
-Original Message-
From: "Luke Bakken"
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2014 1:18pm
To: ll...@writersglen.com
Cc: "riak-users"
Subject: Re: Buckets
Hi Lloyd,
As long as the buckets use the default bucket properties (Riak 1.X
series) or share a bucket ty
Hi Lloyd,
As long as the buckets use the default bucket properties (Riak 1.X
series) or share a bucket type (Riak 2.X series), there is no real
limit to how many you can create outside of server capacity limits.
--
Luke Bakken
CSE
lbak...@basho.com
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 10:08 AM, wrote:
> H
Hello,
Is there a practical limit to the number of buckets defined in a given Riak
installation?
E.g.: I could have a bucket called people with records for each person. Or, I
could have a bucket for each person with records related to that person. But
clearly, in the second case, the number of
Correct, there is a key in LevelDB for each Riak key that has the
index term attached. This is somewhat mitigated by Snappy compression
(600K records might very well compress into a single block), but it is
nowhere near the storage efficiency of something like Solr's indexes.
It still has to scan.
Hi Sean,
Sweet! Thanks for the explanation. Much appreciated and very helpful. Just a
bit more clarification, on an equality lookup, where the ‘foobar’ key has a
value ‘barfoo’ that is the very low-cardinality, are those indexed objects
individually stored as a key/value term which then is enu
Yeah, I know it might be hard to only use Riak, but I want to try see how
much I can do with only 1 system. If later I have to add more complexity to
the system, so be it :) but i will squeeze my brain as much as i can to
model the data in a way not much relationships may be required and probably
R
In a dream world my friend, we have Riak, PostgreSQL and Solr and might
have to include a sort of query-able Big Table implementation in the
future like Cassandra (we will try to avoid this last thing until we can't)
Your Graph DB will have trade off versus KV fetch in general, I don't
think y
Hello, I love the idea of an s3 alternative and was wondering if there was
anyway to use my s3 acces and secret keys with riak-cs. I tried
substituting my keys for the generated ones in both riak-cs and stanchion
app.config files to no avail.
Thanks for any help you can provide, and if I posted in
Hi Alex
Did you have a look at orientdb, it might fit the need that you describe.
Pedro.
On Aug 29, 2014 5:07 PM, "Alex De la rosa" wrote:
> Hi Guido,
>
> This could be a solution; although I would try to do it in an homogeneous
> system where only one NoSQL DB would be around if possible :)
>
Hi Guido,
This could be a solution; although I would try to do it in an homogeneous
system where only one NoSQL DB would be around if possible :)
Thanks!
Alex
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Guido Medina
wrote:
> Maybe what you are looking for is a combination of both, say, your KV
> data i
Maybe what you are looking for is a combination of both, say, your KV
data in Riak with a combination of background processes able to build
the necessary searching graphs in Neo4J, in such way your data is secure
in a Riak cluster and searchable on several Neo4J servers.
That's just an idea wh
Hi there,
For some time already I have in mind building a kind of social network
myself. Is pretty ambitious project although it doesn't have in mind to be
a new facebook; but still data will be quite big and complex.
I like Riak and I had been following since version 0.14, and new additions
in R
Hi Sean,
Seems I was wrong, that makes total sense now that you exposed it, looked a
"too good" feature to me, but seems is not that easy.
By the way, how does "schemas" really work for Riak Search? I went back and
read the documentation but didn't see a real difference from using the
default sch
I made a minor mistake in my example, the PrimaryKey is part of the
index key, whereas the value contains nothing. It's more like this:
{i, IndexName, IndexTerm, PrimaryKey} => <<>>
So for the initial seek, we construct a key like so:
{i, <<"foobar_bin">>, <<"baz">>, <<>>}
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014
Hi Bryan,
Index entries are just keys in LevelDB like normal values are. So,
performance is relatively constant at write time but is O(N) at read
(because you are scanning the index). The high-cardinality term will
definitely be expensive to enumerate, but the low-cardinality terms
will be much le
Alex,
In short, no, you can't create custom types through schemas. Schemas
currently only refer to Riak Search 2.
We would love that too, but it hasn't happened yet. The problem is not
conceiving of a data type but making its behavior both sensible and
convergent in the face of concurrent activit
17 matches
Mail list logo
