Re: [Announcement] Official Riak Node.js client released.

2015-04-04 Thread José Ghislain Quenum
Thanks Brian for your reply and trying to work out the links part. I took a look at the RiakObject and could see how to manipulate it with FetchValue and the Secondary Index. However, I failed to figure out how to access the meta while reading an object. Just as an example, when you're updating

non-indexable SOLR schema

2015-04-04 Thread Alex De la rosa
Hi all, To be able to use counters/sets/maps in Riak I have to store the object into a defined bucket_type indexed via SOLR. However, this will require extra disk space as data will be indexed (if using the default schema). Can I create a custom schema ignoring all fields so nothing is indexed?

Re: non-indexable SOLR schema

2015-04-04 Thread Shawn Debnath
Riak does not in any way rely on solr for its KV operations. Not sure where you are seeing that or what code you are looking at but you can define bucket types, activate them without ever touching solr. The basic bucket type set up instructions can be found here:

Re: non-indexable SOLR schema

2015-04-04 Thread Shawn Debnath
You do not have to set up Yokozuna (yz) to be able to use counters, sets, maps in Riak. Those types can be used independently via the Riak key value store. You only need to set up the indexes if you were to search for data via yz or search 2.0. And in that case, you can remove the generic

Re: non-indexable SOLR schema

2015-04-04 Thread Alex De la rosa
How to do that? For what I have seen, to use these special data types you need to create a bucket under a bucket_type; and this bucket type is created following an index so data gets indexed in Solr. On Saturday, April 4, 2015, Shawn Debnath sh...@debnath.net wrote: You do not have to set up

Re: non-indexable SOLR schema

2015-04-04 Thread Alex De la rosa
Uhm, interesting, I didn't see that page; I believe the one I saw was about using Riak Search and that's where my assumption on needing to create an index to make a bucket_type came along. Much easier though! Thanks! Alex On Saturday, April 4, 2015, Shawn Debnath sh...@debnath.net wrote: