Huh. I thought we were supposed to use force-replace instead of reip?
I remember having a discussion a few months back about the documentation
and we cleared it up a little.
Is reip the same as force-replace, or is it more...quick-and-dirty?
Is it deprecated?
-B.
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 11:33
What happens to your 2i indexes if you do a write and one of the nodes
you're trying to write to is down?
http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/dev/using/2i/ says:
- When you want or need anti-entropy. Since 2i is just metadata on the
KV object and the indexes reside on the same node, 2i
when creating the
objects.
Runar
2013/9/27 Brady Wetherington br...@bespincorp.com
Since I'm doing a write-once, update-never environment - I don't see how
allow_mult would help me otherwise? A new write will always be to a new key.
There will never be an update. So if that's the case
...@gmail.com wrote:
inline.
---
Jeremiah Peschka - Founder, Brent Ozar Unlimited
MCITP: SQL Server 2008, MVP
Cloudera Certified Developer for Apache Hadoop
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Brady Wetherington
br...@bespincorp.comwrote:
I've built it a solid proof-of-concept system on leveldb
I've built it a solid proof-of-concept system on leveldb, and use some 2i
indexes in order to search for certain things - usually just for counts of
things.
I have two questions so far:
First off, why is Bitcask the default? Is it just because it is faster? Or
is it considered more 'stable' or
Well, I'm not sure, and I'm new to Riak too, but I *think* you'd need to
set allow_multi on the bucket.
-B.
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 4:01 AM, Gints gints.gaili...@gmail.com wrote:
I did a PUT, and the vclock that came back was:
a85hYGBgzGDKBVIcypz/fgZJFylnMCUy5rEyNOdtOc2XBQA=
Then I read
I've been working with Basho to get those documents updated - in short - I
have a pull request that makes using Riak with EIP's in Classic-EC2 much,
much easier. They have accepted it, but it has not been merged with the
mainline yet. I'm assuming you are *not* on VPC, is that correct?
If so, you
Oh, I thought the rule was if you have one more node than your n_val, then
you can be sure each replica will be on a distinct node - is that not
correct?
Also with n of 2 I would wonder how you would handle r and w - my guess
would be you *could* set them to 1 each, and just deal with possible
the pieces, but luckily I have a company upstairs
from me that does a very similar thing with 300TB and is willing to help
me set up my ZFS backup infrastructure.
Dave
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Brady Wetherington br...@bespincorp.com
wrote:
I will probably stick with EBS-store for now
for my HA/DR solution once the
business
decides that off-site HA/DR is something it wants/needs.
---
Jeremiah Peschka - Founder, Brent Ozar Unlimited
MCITP: SQL Server 2008, MVP
Cloudera Certified Developer for Apache Hadoop
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Brady Wetherington
Hi all -
I have some questions about how I want my Riak stuff to work - I've already
asked these questions of some Basho people and gotten some answers, but
thought I would toss it out into the wider world to see what you all have
to say, too:
First off - I know 5 instances is the magic number
11 matches
Mail list logo
