Re: Riak Search: cursormark support

Hello Guillaume, We’re definitely working on it for a future release and there is still an open ticket regarding it: https://github.com/basho/yokozuna/issues/309 <https://github.com/basho/yokozuna/issues/309>. Thanks. Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org.

Re: Riak search 2 returning multiple stale results for single record

backend to reap. Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho > On Feb 17, 2016, at 7:59 AM, Peter Roberts wrote: > > Hi Zeeshan, > > Configuring the delete_mode to immediate (or a very low millisecond value) > does prevent this occurring for me, I hadn’t sp

Re: Riak search 2 returning multiple stale results for single record

uld resolve them, or via an internal solr cleanup call, or through a reindexing process. If you want to find me on IRC, we can discuss a few others tools we have that may help you get most of the way there until the new release, depending on the questions I asked in the first paragraph. Than

Re: Riak Search indexing json

Good point Vitaly, also possible. Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org. member/founder of @papers_we_love | paperswelove.org twitter => @zeeshanlakhani > On Feb 10, 2016, at 10:53 AM, Vitaly E <13vitam...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Colin, > >

Re: Riak Search indexing json

iak/latest/dev/using/search/#Indexing-Values> (& http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/dev/advanced/search-schema/#Creating-a-Custom-Schema <http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/dev/advanced/search-schema/#Creating-a-Custom-Schema> may be helpful too). Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | soft

Re: A Solr join query in Riak KV?

https://support.lucidworks.com/hc/en-us/articles/201298257-Sharding-w-joins-SolrCloud-question <https://support.lucidworks.com/hc/en-us/articles/201298257-Sharding-w-joins-SolrCloud-question>. Thanks. Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org. member/founder of @pa

Re: Riak Search 2.0 - CRDT Sets within Maps not returned in search results

Yep, it was changed in latest versions of 2.0 and 2.1. Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org. member/founder of @papers_we_love | paperswelove.org twitter => @zeeshanlakhani > On Jan 27, 2016, at 3:19 PM, Weixi Yen wrote: > > Just FYI, I'm actua

Re: Riak Search 2.0 - CRDT Sets within Maps not returned in search results

hey’re indexed for search, but will not return in the result-set. In 2.0.7 and in 2.1.3, the default schema was changed to store them. If you modify the existing default schema you have (stored=true), reload the schema, and reindex, you’ll see the results. Thanks. Zeeshan Lakhani prog

Re: Riak Search Pagination

Yes. Score is the default ordering. For "ties," insertion order is the default. That order could change based on which node is replicated to first and the different coverage plan may showcase that. Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org. member/

Re: Riak Search Pagination

Best to provide a specific sort ordering on a field if you can. Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org. member/founder of @papers_we_love | twitter => @zeeshanlakhani > On Dec 21, 2015, at 21:54, Garrido wrote: > > No, we don’t provide a sort on the q

Re: Riak Search Pagination

The coverage plan can change per query. Are you providing a sort on the query? If not or if by score, does each item return the same score? Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org. member/founder of @papers_we_love | twitter => @zeeshanlakhani > On Dec 21, 2015,

Re: X-Riak-Meta-* and Solr

the default schema. Hope this helps. Thanks. Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org. member/founder of @papers_we_love | paperswelove.org twitter => @zeeshanlakhani > On Aug 11, 2015, at 5:34 PM, Joe Olson wrote: > > > Is it possible to automatical

Re: Riak Search in bucket with write_once = true

supported in 2.1.2, which is our next release. You can read more about it here: https://github.com/basho/yokozuna/issues/512 <https://github.com/basho/yokozuna/issues/512>. Thanks. Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org. member/founder of @papers_w

Re: SolrException: Error CREATEing SolrCore after deleting index

Hello Hao, I’m guessing that `todoriak_main_movie_idx` is the index you removed? Can you check to see if there are any buckets or bucket_types associated with that search_index? Also, what version of Riak are you using? We have a test here w/ the pb client to test a delete: https://github.com

Re: Selective indexing of Riak Data Types

No problem :). Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org. member/founder of @papers_we_love | paperswelove.org twitter => @zeeshanlakhani > On Jul 31, 2015, at 11:17 AM, Marius Cobzarenco wrote: > > Hi Zeeshan, > > It makes sense, thanks loads for

Re: Selective indexing of Riak Data Types

iles#diff-ab08303805d0b8fe5d7fe683273b2fbfR178>. Obviously, you then don’t need the default, embedded dynamic *_register fields and such, which captures all of them. Hope that helps! Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org. member/founder of @papers_we_love | paperswelove.org twitter => @zeeshanla

Re: Riak 2.1.1 not starting with "search = on"

Hello, We’ve done upgrades and have tests that upgrade from 2.0.* to 2.1.1 without issue. Are you seeing any errors in the solr logs themselves? That may help us debug this. Thanks. Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org. member/founder of @papers_we_love

Re: Yokozuna question

Hey Nick, What version of Riak are you using? Did you see any errors in your Solr log? It may take a little bit to eventually sync up (and remove everything). Thanks. > On Jul 10, 2015, at 3:22 AM, Nick Golovin wrote: > > Hey, guys, could you please help me with this problem: after removing a

Re: Unexpected stored value for multivalued field in riak search

"_yz_id" : "1*multifunarray*b2*multivalued_array*49", "_yz_ed" : "2 49 bXVsdGlmdW5hcnJheQ== YjI= bXVsdGl2YWx1ZWRfYXJyYXk= g2IBnehH", "_yz_rb" : "b2", "_yz_pn" : "49" }

Re: Unexpected stored value for multivalued field in riak search

ucket*3 Names*2", "_yz_rk" : “3 Names", "_yz_rb" : "testbucket" } ],... ``` Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org. member/founder of @papers_we_love | paperswelove.org twitter => @zeeshan

Re: Solr indexes becomes broken after node replacement

h will still re-index via AAE. Nonetheless, we’d like to see the logs and try and reproduce the issue in a test when the node name changes. Thanks. Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho > On Jun 8, 2015, at 8:30 AM, Alexander Popov wrote: > > I was perform all no

Re: [Riak-Users]Why riak search only return 1 result every query, how to return all results at once

To include with Chris’s questions, are you using a custom or the “default” bucket type? Thanks. Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org. member/founder of @papers_we_love | paperswelove.org twitter => @zeeshanlakhani > On May 5, 2015, at 4:22 AM, Christopher Meik

Re: Reindexing solr after backup restore

Awesome. Thanks. Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org. member/founder of @papers_we_love | twitter => @zeeshanlakhani > On Apr 24, 2015, at 8:56 PM, Jason Campbell wrote: > > This may be a case of force-replace vs replace vs reip. I'm happy to se

Re: Reindexing solr after backup restore

ust the first? > > Thanks for the help, > Jason > >> On 25 Apr 2015, at 00:36, Zeeshan Lakhani wrote: >> >> Hey Jason, >> >> Here’s a little more discussion on Yokozuna backup strategies: >> http://lists.basho.com/pipermail/riak-users_lists.basho.

Re: Reindexing solr after backup restore

elated info on this thread: http://lists.basho.com/pipermail/riak-users_lists.basho.com/2015-March/016929.html <http://lists.basho.com/pipermail/riak-users_lists.basho.com/2015-March/016929.html>. Thanks. Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org. membe

Re: Yokozuna queries slow

the index (not bucket); so, it’s something we’re looking into. Thanks for helping out :). Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org. member/founder of @papers_we_love | paperswelove.org twitter => @zeeshanlakhani > On Apr 21, 2015, at 5:41 PM, Steve Garon

Re: Yokozuna queries slow

Nice Steve. Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org. member/founder of @papers_we_love | paperswelove.org twitter => @zeeshanlakhani > On Apr 21, 2015, at 3:57 PM, Steve Garon wrote: > > Jason, > > Comment the section in the bucket's solrco

Re: Yokozuna queries slow

I hope that one of the next few point releases will see the fix. Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org. member/founder of @papers_we_love | paperswelove.org twitter => @zeeshanlakhani > On Apr 21, 2015, at 4:11 AM, Jason Campbell wrote: > > Thanks Ze

Re: Yokozuna queries slow

ass YZ, but then you’d have to create a way to generate your own coverage plans and other things involving distributed solr that YZ gives you. Nonetheless, we’re actively working on improving these issues you’ve encountered. Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org.

Re: Distributed joins and Riak search

wse/LUCENE-3759>. Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org. member/founder of @papers_we_love | paperswelove.org twitter => @zeeshanlakhani > On Apr 7, 2015, at 4:26 PM, Karri Niemelä wrote: > > Do same limitations apply for yokozuna and SolrCloud? > (h

Re: Riak Search 2.0 & Tagging

com/riak/latest/dev/using/search/#Querying>. Thanks. Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org. member/founder of @papers_we_love | paperswelove.org twitter => @zeeshanlakhani > On Apr 7, 2015, at 4:28 AM, Antonio Teixeira wrote: > > Hi , > > I've

Re: Riak Search 2.0 & Tagging

8158ba/riak_test/yokozuna_essential.erl#L281 <https://github.com/basho/yokozuna/blob/5868266b11f131d14c85495e50f899f3fe8158ba/riak_test/yokozuna_essential.erl#L281>. Thanks. Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org. member/founder of @papers_we_love | paperswelove

Re: Delete Objects SOLR

moving indexes or setting indexes to _dont_index_. Thanks. Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org. member/founder of @papers_we_love | paperswelove.org twitter => @zeeshanlakhani > On Mar 30, 2015, at 3:39 PM, Jorge Garrido gomez wrote: > > Hello, >

Re: Riak2.0 with Solr Search: index on one node contains not all entries

tml> if you continue to see issues with Riak Search being out-of-sync. Thanks. Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org. member/founder of @papers_we_love | paperswelove.org twitter => @zeeshanlakhani > On Mar 25, 2015, at 12:27 PM, Michael Weibel wrote: >

Re: Riak2.0 with Solr Search: index on one node contains not all entries

Hey Michael, Ideally, for this “testing" setup, n_val=2 would be the effective choice. I’d create a new bucket_type/bucket and re-PUT your data in and test search again to be sure. Let me know. Thanks. Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org. member/found

Re: Riak2.0 with Solr Search: index on one node contains not all entries

26.html>, for answers on how to perform read-repair/repair the AAE tree. Thanks. Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org. member/founder of @papers_we_love | paperswelove.org twitter => @zeeshanlakhani > On Mar 25, 2015, at 6:42 AM, Michael Weibel wrote: > >

Re: Trouble with Riak Search JSON Extractor

And Matt, please choose one platform to discuss the matter, preferably here :). It makes things easier. Thanks. Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org. member/founder of @papers_we_love | paperswelove.org twitter => @zeeshanlakhani > On Mar 23, 2015, at 12

Re: Trouble with Riak Search JSON Extractor

. Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org. member/founder of @papers_we_love | paperswelove.org twitter => @zeeshanlakhani > On Mar 23, 2015, at 12:07 PM, Matt Brooks wrote: > > Zeeshan, > > Is there a way to reload the index manually? I tried running >

Re: Trouble with Riak Search JSON Extractor

uecomment-43802826>. Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org. member/founder of @papers_we_love | paperswelove.org twitter => @zeeshanlakhani > On Mar 22, 2015, at 9:37 PM, Matt Brooks wrote: > > Just discovered this on GitHub https://github.com/basho/yokoz

Re: Trouble with Riak Search JSON Extractor

` true. Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org. member/founder of @papers_we_love | paperswelove.org twitter => @zeeshanlakhani > On Mar 22, 2015, at 4:13 PM, Matt Brooks wrote: > > Hello, > > I have a quick question about a search schema that would inde

Re: Different numFound request to riak search

ed > > I delete data folder and run init method, i'll results after it rebuild > trees. > > 2015-03-12 18:22 GMT+03:00 Zeeshan Lakhani <mailto:zlakh...@basho.com>>: > Are you noticing any Solr errors in the logs? > > For your container instance, you can attem

Re: Different numFound request to riak search

s. > > On dev, i have 1 instance in docker container, never added to cluster. But > data in that riak is imported from production cluster a while ago. > > I can give you a copy of container, if you need to. > > Thanks, > Ronan Lakotko > > > > 2015-03-12

Re: Different numFound request to riak search

/search/). You may just need to perform a read-repair by performing a fetch of the object itself first, before performing search queries again. Also, have you left or added nodes? I’m guessing that even your 1 node instance is still running a cluster on that one node, right? Thanks. Zeeshan

Re: Yokozuna - Solr won't start, keeps throwing OutOfMemoryErrors

i.apache.org/solr/SolrPerformanceFactors#OutOfMemoryErrors>. Updating search.solr.jvm_options should alleviate most issues however. Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org. member/founder of @papers_we_love | paperswelove.org twitter => @zeeshanlakhani > On Mar 10

Re: Query on Riak Search in a cluster of 3 nodes behind ELB is giving different result everytime

increasing jvm heap memory settings for your use-case. Thanks. Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org. member/founder of @papers_we_love | paperswelove.org twitter => @zeeshanlakhani > On Mar 9, 2015, at 10:13 AM, Baskar Srinivasan wrote: > > Hello Zeeshan, >

Re: Query on Riak Search in a cluster of 3 nodes behind ELB is giving different result everytime

deling Riak Search data and the issues you’ll have with the overhead with gossiping so much metadata and the what Solr can handle. Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org. member/founder of @papers_we_love | paperswelove.org twitter => @zeeshanlakhani > On Mar 9, 2015

Re: Searching

working on testing patches internally. Thanks. Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org. member/founder of @papers_we_love | paperswelove.org twitter => @zeeshanlakhani > On Mar 7, 2015, at 11:02 AM, Jason Ryan wrote: > > We have seen crash _yz_events yes,

Re: Searching

err fields when dealing with failed extractions) or possible sibling explosion (duplicates of the same object with different _yz_vtag fields)? Thanks. Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org. member/founder of @papers_we_love | paperswelove.org twitter => @zeeshanl

Re: Still getting peaks on solr queries

ion of these statistics is still in progress, but you can see what’s available for search here: https://github.com/basho/yokozuna/blob/develop/src/yz_stat.erl#L92 <https://github.com/basho/yokozuna/blob/develop/src/yz_stat.erl#L92>. Thanks. Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engine

Re: Query on Riak Search in a cluster of 3 nodes behind ELB is giving different result everytime

ign to prevent such issues. You can read more about Solr’s performance factors here -> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPerformanceFactors <http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPerformanceFactors>. Thanks. Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org. member/founder of

Re: Riak 2.0 Search Issues

sured-up in our next release/patch-release to help solve these issues. As I mentioned, we’re working on a fix for this with an internal patch that we’re testing at this moment. Thanks. Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org. member/founder of @papers_we_love

Re: Query on Riak Search in a cluster of 3 nodes behind ELB is giving different result everytime

Hello Santi, Baskar. Please keep your messages on the user group mailing list, btw. Thanks. Here’s an example of our testing harness’s wait_for_index function, https://github.com/basho/yokozuna/blob/develop/riak_test/yz_rt.erl#L420

Fwd: Query on Riak Search in a cluster of 3 nodes behind ELB is giving different result everytime

Srinivasan > To: Santi Kumar > Cc: Zeeshan Lakhani > > Hello Zeeshan, > > I work with Santi on the same server backend component. Our primary issue > seems to be that Index creation and Bucket association with the indices is > being done via load balancer. After we

Re: Riak 2.0 Search Issues

dex.erl#L171 <https://github.com/basho/yokozuna/blob/92ca14cc35b46c8e7ac86cad6d92547e68e8d917/src/yz_index.erl#L171>. If that doesn’t work, you can then delete or `mv` that search-root/index directory out of the way, for which it will then get recreated and AAE will sync the data. Thanks

Re: Query on Riak Search in a cluster of 3 nodes behind ELB is giving different result everytime

/advanced/configs/search/). You may just need to perform a read-repair by performing a fetch of the object itself first, before performing search queries again. Thanks. Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org. member/founder of @papers_we_love | paperswelove.org twitter

Re: Riak 2.0 Search Issues

crash logs? Also, can you gist/pastebin me your solr logs? I’d like to seem if it correlates with something we’re currently looking at. Thanks. Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org. member/founder of @papers_we_love | paperswelove.org twitter => @zeeshanlakhani &

Re: 2.0.5 compiled from source SOLR failed to start

-g122659d/priv` for example)? Thanks. Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org. member/founder of @papers_we_love | twitter => @zeeshanlakhani > On Feb 27, 2015, at 5:46 AM, Alexander Popov wrote: > > 2015-02-27 10:38:27.960 [info] <0.563.0>@yz_solr_proc:e

Re: YZ search schema question

Just for the query itself, then yep :). Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org. member/founder of @papers_we_love | twitter => @zeeshanlakhani > On Feb 24, 2015, at 10:11 AM, Michael Martin wrote: > > Hi Zeeshan, > > Actually, I was trying to mak

Re: YZ search schema question

and http://stackoverflow.com/a/5800830 <http://stackoverflow.com/a/5800830>. Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org. member/founder of @papers_we_love | twitter => @zeeshanlakhani > On Feb 24, 2015, at 9:35 AM, Michael Martin wrote: > > Hi all, > &

Re: Yokozuna unpredictable result count

n queries. Also, when you added the > object, did you add it and later leave (drop) a node from your cluster? > > Thanks. > > Zeeshan Lakhani > programmer | > software engineer at @basho | > org. member/founder of @papers_we_love | > twitter => @zeeshanlakhani > >>

Re: Yokozuna unpredictable result count

So, AAE is running. Again, did you delete the single object at some point? Trying to see if this is related to you hitting a tombstone on queries. Also, when you added the object, did you add it and later leave (drop) a node from your cluster? Thanks. Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software

Re: Yokozuna unpredictable result count

/configs/search/ <http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/ops/advanced/configs/search/>). You may just need to perform a read-repair by performing a fetch of the object itself first, before performing search queries again. Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org. member/foun

Re: Yokozuna unpredictable result count

Hello Cezary, Firstly, are you able to retrieve your search result consistently when not using doing a mapreduce job? To better help out, can you send a gist of the mapreduce code you’re running? Thanks. > On Feb 18, 2015, at 9:13 PM, Cezary Kosko wrote: > > Hi, > > I've got a search inde

Re: Riak 2.0.4 Search AAE

l#L187 <https://github.com/basho/yokozuna/blob/47214a66e07fdfd04bbaae6bdd18580f87693edf/include/yokozuna.hrl#L187>), you can, via `riak attach`, update the environment vars of entropy_expire, tick, and concurrency to speed up AAE in your testing of this bug. Zeeshan Lakhani programmer

Re: Riak 2.0.4 Search AAE

gs/search/>, about search’s config settings. Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org. member/founder of @papers_we_love | twitter => @zeeshanlakhani > On Feb 18, 2015, at 9:03 AM, Steve Garon wrote: > > Hi all, > > I seem to have trouble with aae o

Re: Search reindexing during a handoff?

Search does reindex objects during a handoff. Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org. member/founder of @papers_we_love | twitter => @zeeshanlakhani > On Feb 17, 2015, at 11:55 AM, Miroslav Urbanek > wrote: > > Hello, > > I have a four node