Hi,
64 is a bit low, I guess 128 would be better to avoid such situation.
I.
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 2:26 PM Travis Kirstine <
tkirst...@firstbasesolutions.com> wrote:
> I’m running riak (v2.14) in a 5 node cluster and for some reason one of
> the nodes has higher disk usage than the other nodes
disk usage on node
I think your best bet is to do a force-replace (and then a manual repair, if
you are not using AAE) with a node that has higher capacity than your current
standby. You are correct that replacing with your standby will fail when you
run repairs and end up running out of space.
I
I think your best bet is to do a force-replace (and then a manual repair, if
you are not using AAE) with a node that has higher capacity than your current
standby. You are correct that replacing with your standby will fail when you
run repairs and end up running out of space.
I think you do NO
Hi Travis,
I see you have encountered the disk space pickle. Just for the record, the
safest way to run Riak in production is to keep all resources (CPU, RAM,
Network, Disk Space, I/O etc.) below 70% utilization on all nodes at all times.
The reason behind this is to compensate for when one or m
