(over the long term) the
necessity of resizing the ring (in order to double the number of partitions)
seems unavoidable to me.
On Github, the v1.4 changelog seems to indicate that the ring resizing
feature is now merged in the release (notably from riak-core#301); however,
the official documentation
Hey PN,
I'm the engineer at Basho working on Ring Resizing, primarily. I've left
some comments inline.
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 12:46 AM, pseudo-n...@laposte.net wrote:
Dear all,
After a quick glimpse at Riak, I must say I like it: DHT with masterless
design and gossiping protocol, that is
the long term) the
necessity of resizing the ring (in order to double the number of partitions)
seems unavoidable to me.
On Github, the v1.4 changelog seems to indicate that the ring resizing
feature is now merged in the release (notably from riak-core#301); however,
the official documentation
That's about the rights of it. As I was reading your message I did some quick
math and sure enough you already put that same number down. I've heard told
that the max size for any Erlang network, of which Riak is most assuredly, is
200 Erlang VM's. Extrapolating from there, considering that
