Yury, thank you for sharing your investigations. It is very useful to read!
2017-10-03 8:32 GMT+03:00 Yury Shevchuk :
> Greetings!
>
> We have published a paper on the subject. It may be of interest for
> Riak developers and users who put Riak under heavy write load.
>
>
Hi all,Thanks for taking over riak management.I am strongly commited to
the success of this take over as we intensively use riak for our
customers solutions.Arnaud Wetzel, founder and CTO of KBRW, the company
I'm actually working for, has been contributing to riak but, due the
lack of visibility
Greetings!
We have published a paper on the subject. It may be of interest for
Riak developers and users who put Riak under heavy write load.
English: http://psta.psiras.ru/read/psta2017_3_61-85.pdf
Russian (native): http://psta.psiras.ru/read/psta2017_3_31-60.pdf
Best,
-- Yury
This looks cool, and might give some indication that back pressure
should be aware of available file system space..
Any plans on LevelDB testing? A newer option Leveled might be cool to
compare with as well.
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 6:58 AM, Grigory Fateyev wrote:
> Yury, thank
I suspect with the test environment having only 4GB of RAM and a single
slow disk per node - both Leveldb and Leveled are going to struggle in
terms of the write throughput. As n=1 in this test, some of the advantages
of Leveled will be lost also (e.g. the n HEADs advantage).
I thought the paper