Dear Chuisy,
The broad bump you are experiencing at low angle may be to do with the
slits. One has to be careful with these new XRD machines which have
variable slits, to make sure the divergent and the anti-scattering slits
are equal and if you choose to keep the slits fixed, which usually
Dear Christian (and others)
your reply about preferred orientation probabaly not being a problem with a cubic
mineral is of interest to me.
This is something I have wondered about in the past because of observations I have
made on common salt, so I thought I would contribute to this discussion
In this case it is case it is expected that there
will be formation of dislocation loops in the material due to
irradiation.
Well, simulations which would be made on the same
material in the case of different kinds of dislocations
and defaults could say if really the line-broadening is
the
Dear Stephen,
You are quite correct. I was going to make the same reply to Christian's
comment also using NaCl as an example. What I would add though is that NaCl
may be more prone to preferred orientation as the cubes are close to
perfect - in contrast to say cubic zeolites where I have
your reply about preferred orientation probabaly not being a problem with
a cubic mineral is of interest to me.
I can testify to have seen huge preferred orientation occuring
in some cubic perovskites, at least. Too much intensity in those
h00.
Armel
Hi,
Looking at the attached file, my opinion is that this effect is caused by a
quite large divergent (or both divergent and anti-scattering) slits. It is
not normal to have over 1000 counts at 5 degrees 2-theta. This could be due
either by a portion of incident beam or by a scattering from the
Dear William,
Thank you for your kind suggestion.
Well, our XRD is not a very new model, we use a fixed divergent slit, receving
slit and antiscattering slits. But I need to check them whether the divergent
and anti-scattering slits are in the same sizes. When I added the anti-scatter
slit, the
Hi All,
There is a new version of Windows GSAS on the CCP14 web server. The biggest change is
that it will now do Pawley style extractions for one set of reflections from multiple
powder patterns. This is done inside GENLES. See below for note on this other
changes. Linux other versions will
I am using the software Quanto to quantify some simple patterns, mixes of
calcite and quartz.
I read a lot of information about Rietveld, but I have not enough
knowledgments about crystal structures, PO, etc.
I refined a pattern of 15% of quartz and 85% of calcite. I got a Gof of 1.9
using Model
Dear Stephen,
I apologise for calling you chuisy last time round.
One suggest to test the size of the footprint is, I think, to use common
rock salt. Grind this up and place liberally over your plate and you can
check at low angle where the X-rays are striking the plate, because the
salt will go
10 matches
Mail list logo