One more cent to the recent discussion on the Hofman potential.
Alan, you have stopped the discussion saying that you are responsible
for the content of this mailing list. I hope not. If some journals
publish the opinions of their readers they always add a notice that the
ideas expressed in
-- Virus Warning Message (on madrid)
Found virus WORM_NETSKY.P in file details.txt
.pif (in readme_rietveld_l.zip)
The uncleanable file readme_rietveld_l.zip is moved to /opt/trend/virus/virS9dK0F.
You are responsible for the technical management of the Rietveld mailing list not for
its content. It is only the person signing the message who is responsible for its
content. Is it correct?
A very good question, and I welcome the opportunity to change the subject :-)
Yes, the person signing
Yes, I fully agree with you, Alan.
Yes, the person signing messages to the Rietveld list is responsible for their content. As you
know, many mailing lists are filtered by a moderator. This is also the case for
printed journals, which you gave as an example - the editor chooses to print letters,
...you have no technical tools to prevent us from continuing :-)
Did I say that :-) Alan.
Dr Alan W. Hewat, Diffraction Group Leader.
Institut Laue-Langevin, BP 156X Grenoble FRANCE 38042
fax (33)4.76.20.76.48 tel (33)4.76.20.72.13 (or .26 Mme Guillermet)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Title: Message
What
is the unit cell? Have you tried looking for analogous compounds with the
same (or similar) unit cells? You might be able to avoid solving the
structure if a model is already out there. What is the space group?
It may be that it is one with a floating origin, and that
