RE: % Crystallinity

2008-02-28 Thread john o callaghan
I'd like to thank everyone for their thoughts and input on this question. Without the Rietveld list I would not know where to begin. Thanks again, John O’Callaghan Subject: RE: % CrystallinityDate: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 22:30:43 -0600From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL

RE: % Crystallinity

2008-02-28 Thread Whitfield, Pamela
Polymers are not a good example for the spiking method as it is difficult to find a standard with a good absorption match (although diamond and LiF are possibilities), people don't usually hand them to you as nice micron-sized powders (poor particle stats on a lab system), and a few other issues.

Re: % Crystallinity

2008-02-28 Thread Jim Cline
Hi all, Please prepare for a shameless plug for the newly certified NIST SRM 676a: In order to measure amorphous content (via non-PDF diffraction methods) one needs two things: 1) An unbiased diffraction method for measurement of phase abundance (laughter please) and 2) A standard of known phase

particle size broadening in FullProf

2008-02-28 Thread Wenduo Zhou
Dear All, I have nano-particle with size 30nm, and want to simulate its particle size-effect on peak broadening. I know in FullProf, some size-models are supported, but I don't know how to select the correct model and relate to the real particle size. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks,