NAC standard

2014-03-03 Thread Łukasz Kruszewski
Dear friends!

I have a question regarding the NAC transmission diffraction standard,
which is Na2Ca3Al2F14. Is this standard safe in use, i.e., do I need any
special safety when grinding it?

Best regards!

-- 
Łukasz Kruszewski, Ph.D., adjunct
Polish Academy of Sciences
Institute of Geological Sciences
X-Ray Diffraction Laboratory (coordinator)
Twarda 51/55 str.
00-818 Warsaw
Poland
++
Please do NOT attach files to the whole list alan.he...@neutronoptics.com
Send commands to lists...@ill.fr eg: HELP as the subject with no body text
The Rietveld_L list archive is on http://www.mail-archive.com/rietveld_l@ill.fr/
++



Re: NAC standard

2014-03-03 Thread Tomce Runcevski

...don't breathe it in, don't eat, nor drink, and wear safety glasses,...

Lovely :)



Zitat von Andy FITCH fi...@esrf.fr:


Dear ?ukasz,

NAC is not a standard as it has never been subjected to any sort  
of formal procedure to ascertain its characteristics. Indeed each  
batch can be different.
However, it is often highly crystalline, and so gives sharp peaks in  
a powder diffraction pattern, depending on which batch of sample it  
is.
In terms of safety in handling it, I would suggest using normal safe  
powder-handling procedures; don't breathe it in, don't eat, nor  
drink, and wear safety glasses, lab coat, etc. .
But why are you grinding it? Won't that affect the nice  
microstructure you're exploiting? And if it ever were certified as  
some sort of standard, grinding it is not the thing to do.


Best regards

Andy


On 02/03/2014 16:10, ?ukasz Kruszewski wrote:

Dear friends!

I have a question regarding the NAC transmission diffraction standard,
which is Na2Ca3Al2F14. Is this standard safe in use, i.e., do I need any
special safety when grinding it?

Best regards!








++
Please do NOT attach files to the whole list alan.he...@neutronoptics.com
Send commands to lists...@ill.fr eg: HELP as the subject with no body text
The Rietveld_L list archive is on http://www.mail-archive.com/rietveld_l@ill.fr/
++



Re: NAC standard

2014-03-03 Thread Alan Hewat
On 3 March 2014 12:30, Tomce Runcevski t.runcev...@fkf.mpg.de wrote:

 ...don't breathe it in, don't eat, nor drink, and wear safety glasses,...
 Lovely :)


OK :-)  AVOID breathing it in, don't eat, nor drink IN A LABORATORY, and
wear safety glasses...

It's not a joke. Those precautions should be second nature, especially in a
chemistry or radiation laboratory.

Alan
__
*   Dr Alan Hewat, NeutronOptics, Grenoble, FRANCE *
alan.he...@neutronoptics.com +33.476.98.41.68
http://www.NeutronOptics.com/hewat
__
++
Please do NOT attach files to the whole list alan.he...@neutronoptics.com
Send commands to lists...@ill.fr eg: HELP as the subject with no body text
The Rietveld_L list archive is on http://www.mail-archive.com/rietveld_l@ill.fr/
++



on high pressure data indexing and unit cell reduction

2014-03-03 Thread Young, Lindsay
Hello all - I've gotten stuck at a point in my data refinement, I'd appreciate 
it if someone has any suggestions for me.


I have been trying to index high pressure data. It was collected using a 
diamond anvil cell with a 2d detector. I integrated the data on GSAS II, using 
the penetration correction. I opened this data on Jade to do peak fitting, and 
indexed the resulting peak list in Topas. I managed to get a reasonable 
monoclinic cell - but it is not in standard cell notation - the angle for beta 
is 142 degrees, and I would like see this cell represented such that is between 
90 and 130 degrees.


I tried indexing this peak list in Treor and Dicvol, with no results. I then 
tried putting the unit cell from Topas into hklgen, taking the peaks it 
generated (which do match those in the pattern), and indexing them with Treor 
and Dicvol, but neither program turns out any results. I did tweak the standard 
settings of both programs to try to get results, but this was not successful.


The idea is, if we can get the same result in another program as we did in 
Topas, it could further show that the result is correct.


Does anyone know how I can convert this cell? Is there a unit cell reduction 
program I could use? If you need any additional information please let me know!
++
Please do NOT attach files to the whole list alan.he...@neutronoptics.com
Send commands to lists...@ill.fr eg: HELP as the subject with no body text
The Rietveld_L list archive is on http://www.mail-archive.com/rietveld_l@ill.fr/
++



Re: on high pressure data indexing and unit cell reduction

2014-03-03 Thread Lubomir Smrcok

Hi,
I really enjoy your arguing ... The cell got by Topas is correct and the 
other programs fail to support this idea. Try ITO ... if you have at least 
20 peaks.


Back to real life where  gems do not rule. To check a  cell I can 
only recommend a standalone program nicknamed LePage, which is really 
good. A good trick I frequently use is to take any working input to 
Platon in any format, edit the cell and run it with Calc all. Of course, 
you will get a lot of rubbish, but at the very beginning there's also a 
good cell analysis.


A hint : if you have troubles with a cell, why not to post it :-) ?

Happy indexing,
lubo





On Mon, 3 Mar 2014, Young, Lindsay wrote:



Hello all - I've gotten stuck at a point in my data refinement, I'd
appreciate it if someone has any suggestions for me.


I have been trying to index high pressure data. It was collected using a
diamond anvil cell with a 2d detector. I integrated the data on GSAS II,
using the penetration correction. I opened this data on Jade to do peak
fitting, and indexed the resulting peak list in Topas. I managed to get a
reasonable monoclinic cell - but it is not in standard cell notation - the
angle for beta is 142 degrees, and I would like see this cell represented
such that is between 90 and 130 degrees. 



I tried indexing this peak list in Treor and Dicvol, with no
results. I then tried putting the unit cell from Topas into hklgen, taking
the peaks it generated (which do match those in the pattern), and indexing
them with Treor and Dicvol, but neither program turns out any results. I did
tweak the standard settings of both programs to try to get results, but this
was not successful. 



The idea is, if we can get the same result in another program as we did in
Topas, it could further show that the result is correct. 



Does anyone know how I can convert this cell? Is there a unit cell reduction
program I could use? If you need any additional information please let me
know!



++
Please do NOT attach files to the whole list alan.he...@neutronoptics.com
Send commands to lists...@ill.fr eg: HELP as the subject with no body text
The Rietveld_L list archive is on http://www.mail-archive.com/rietveld_l@ill.fr/
++



Re: on high pressure data indexing and unit cell reduction

2014-03-03 Thread Roberto R. de Avillez
Cell conversion may be done with the programs provided by Bilbao 
Crystallography Server (http://www.cryst.ehu.es/). Consider using the 
programs:

GENPOS and CELLTRAN.

On 03/03/2014 05:55 PM, Young, Lindsay wrote:


Hello all - I've gotten stuck at a point in my data refinement, I'd 
appreciate it if someone has any suggestions for me.



I have been trying to index high pressure data. It was collected using 
a diamond anvil cell with a 2d detector. I integrated the data on GSAS 
II, using the penetration correction. I opened this data on Jade to do 
peak fitting, and indexed the resulting peak list in Topas. I managed 
to get a reasonable monoclinic cell - but it is not in standard cell 
notation - the angle for beta is 142 degrees, and I would like see 
this cell represented such that is between 90 and 130 degrees.



I tried indexing this peak list in Treor and Dicvol, with no 
results. I then tried putting the unit cell from Topas into hklgen, 
taking the peaks it generated (which do match those in the pattern), 
and indexing them with Treor and Dicvol, but neither program turns out 
any results. I did tweak the standard settings of both programs to try 
to get results, but this was not successful.



The idea is, if we can get the same result in another program as we 
did in Topas, it could further show that the result is correct.



Does anyone know how I can convert this cell? Is there a unit cell 
reduction program I could use? If you need any additional information 
please let me know!




++
Please do NOT attach files to the whole list alan.he...@neutronoptics.com
Send commands to lists...@ill.fr eg: HELP as the subject with no body text
The Rietveld_L list archive is on http://www.mail-archive.com/rietveld_l@ill.fr/
++



Re: on high pressure data indexing and unit cell reduction

2014-03-03 Thread Leonid Solovyov
Unit cell
standardization may be done in VESTA
http://jp-minerals.org/vesta
Load a CIF
to VESTA and go to Utilities-Standardization of Crystal Data
then File-Export
Data
 
***
Leonid A. Solovyov
Institute of Chemistry and Chemical Technology
660036, Akademgorodok 50/24, Krasnoyarsk, Russia
http://sites.google.com/site/solovyovleonid
***



On Tuesday, March 4, 2014 3:56 AM, Young, Lindsay 
lindsay.yo...@rockets.utoledo.edu wrote:
 
 
 
Hello all - I've gotten stuck at a point in my data refinement, I'd appreciate 
it if someone has any suggestions for me.


I have been trying to index high pressure data. It was collected using a 
diamond anvil cell with a 2d detector. I integrated the data on GSAS II, using 
the penetration correction. I opened this data on Jade to do peak fitting, and 
indexed the resulting peak list in Topas. I managed to get a reasonable 
monoclinic cell - but it is not in standard cell notation - the angle for beta 
is 142 degrees, and I would like see this cell represented such that is between 
90 and 130 degrees. 


I tried indexing this peak list in Treor and Dicvol, with no results. I then 
tried putting the unit cell from Topas into hklgen, taking the peaks it 
generated (which do match those in the pattern), and indexing them with Treor 
and Dicvol, but neither program turns out any results. I did tweak the standard 
settings of both programs to try to get results, but this was not successful. 


The idea is, if we can get the same result in another program as we did in 
Topas, it could further show that the result is correct. 


Does anyone know how I can convert this cell? Is there a unit cell reduction 
program I could use? If you need any additional information please let me know!

++
Please do NOT attach files to the whole list alan.he...@neutronoptics.com
Send commands to lists...@ill.fr eg: HELP as the subject with no body text
The Rietveld_L list archive is on http://www.mail-archive.com/rietveld_l@ill.fr/

Please do NOT attach files to the whole list alan.he...@neutronoptics.com
Send commands to lists...@ill.fr eg: HELP as the subject with no body text
The Rietveld_L list archive is on http://www.mail-archive.com/rietveld_l@ill.fr/
++