Re: [sdpd] Re: RIET/SDPD a suggestion...

1999-01-02 Thread Lubomir Smrcok

That's great to assume everybody uses the same  software as you do,
Armel ...
I think also CIF was developed to avoid thousands of formats. Why not to
standardize e-mail exchange first and only THEN proceed with powder data
:_)
Lubo

On Fri, 5 Nov 1999, Armel Le Bail wrote:

 html
 font size=3L. Cranswick wrote:br
 br
 gt;As while native data would be a good quality check -br
 gt;something like this of would need standard filebr
 gt;formats to be managable and of maximum usefulness -br
 gt;and that means CIF, and powder programs THAT CANbr
 gt;ROUTINELY import/write CIF structures and data(?))br
 gt;...br
 gt;br
 gt;Comments?br
 br
 When I read the introduction to Powder CIF at :br
 nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;
 a href="http://www.iucr.org/iucr-top/cif/pd/index.html" eudora="autourl"font 
size=3http://www.iucr.org/iucr-top/cif/pd/index.html/abr
 font size=3gt;quot;..the powder CIF effort had the additional goals
 of documentingbr
 gt;and archiving experimental data. It is intended that powder CIF
 bebr
 gt;used for communication of completed studies, but also for databr
 gt;exchange between laboratories. This is frequently done at 
 sharedbr
 gt;diffraction facilities such as neutron and synchrotron sources.
 Thebr
 gt;powder dictionary was written anticipating needs from
 conventionalbr
 gt;X-ray diffractometers, as well as from synchrotron, CW neutron,br
 gt;TOF neutron, and energy dispersive X-ray instruments .quot;br
 br
 Well, that is exactly what we want. But is there somewhere anbr
 archive already ? Not exactly in the sense of a what we expectbr
 (a free database, searchable online).br
 br
 And about conversion software, the list is quite short at br
 nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;
 a href="http://www.iucr.org/iucr-top/cif/index.html" eudora="autourl"font 
size=3http://www.iucr.org/iucr-top/cif/index.html/afont size=3nbsp;
 :br
 br
 nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; cif2sx, a CIF to SHELXL93 converter. br
 nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; DIFRAC, a package for translating diffractometer
 output frombr
 
nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;
 many systems to CIF. br
 nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; pdb2cif Version 2.3.7, a filter for translating PDB
 format filesbr
 
nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;
 to mmCIF. br
 nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; cif2pdb Version 1.0.1, a filter for translating mmCIF
 to PDBbr
 
nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;
 format. br
 br
 We would expect to find something like :br
 nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; POWCIF, a package for translating powder
 diffractometer ouputbr
 
nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;
 from many systems to CIF as well as for translatingbr
 
nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;
 reversely CIF to many data formats (diffractometer br
 
nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;
 output and Rietveld software entries).br
 br
 But POWCIF does not exist (or am I wrong ?), and this is thebr
 main restraint to the Powder CIF use.br
 br
 So that, what are doing the guys that want to use a powder CIFbr
 file ? They edit the file and pick up the data, manually.br
 br
 Finally, I would ask a question. Why the producers of Powder CIFbr
 which quot;had the additional goals of documenting and archivingbr
 experimental dataquot; finally did not produce and organize the
 freebr
 archive ? Is it because of ICDD, which quot;has significant input,br
 along with others, for the design of this dictionaryquot; (the
 Powderbr
 CIF dictionary), and had the project to build a commercialbr
 database ?br
 br
 Having sponsors has to be paid somewhere...br
 br
 Best,br
 br
 Armel Le Bailbr
 font size=3a href="http://sdpd.univ-lemans.fr/course/" 
eudora="autourl"http://sdpd.univ-lemans.fr/course//abr
 br
 font size=3 /fontbr
 divArmel Le Bail - Universite du Maine, Laboratoire des
 Fluorures,/div
 divCNRS ESA 6010, Av. O. Messiaen, 72085 Le Mans Cedex 9, 
 France/div
 diva href="http://www.cristal.org/" 
EUDORA=AUTOURLhttp://www.cristal.org//a/div
 /html
 
 
 hrcenter
 a target="egnewwin" href="http://clickhere.egroups.com/click/1454"
 center
 img width="468" height="60" border="0"
   src="http://clickhere.egroups.com/img/001454/r15_rate_meter.gif"
   alt="click here"
 /center
 center
 Click here!
 /center
 /a
 
 /center
 
 eGroups.com Home: a 
href="http://www.egroups.com/group/sdpd"http://www.egroups.com/group/sdpd/abr
 a href="http://www.egroups.com"www.egroups.com/a - Simplifying group 
communicationsbr
 
 




Re: [sdpd] Re: RIET/SDPD a suggestion...

1999-01-02 Thread Armel Le Bail

At 09:14 05/11/99 +0100, Lubomir Smrcok wrote:
That's great to assume everybody uses the same  software as you do,
Armel ...
I think also CIF was developed to avoid thousands of formats. Why not to
standardize e-mail exchange first and only THEN proceed with powder data
:_)
Lubo

On Fri, 5 Nov 1999, Armel Le Bail wrote:

 html
 font size=3L. Cranswick wrote:br
 br
 gt;As while native data would be a good quality check -br
 gt;something like this of would need standard filebr
 gt;formats to be managable and of maximum usefulness -br
 gt;and that means CIF, and powder programs THAT CANbr
 gt;ROUTINELY import/write CIF structures and data(?))br

Ooops !
Well, it looks like a CIF file ;-)
But, Lubo, you mean that you have not updated your email
software to be able to cope with HTML, automatically ?

Armel
http://sdpd.univ-lemans.fr/course/

Armel Le Bail - Universite du Maine, Laboratoire des Fluorures,
CNRS ESA 6010, Av. O. Messiaen, 72085 Le Mans Cedex 9, France
http://www.cristal.org/