ne 11, 2015 3:37 PM
Subject: Re: Experimental and calculated RIRs of metals from ICDD
Experimental RIRs are trash? theoretical RIRs do not represent at all any
reasonable experimental system? there is not error bar in RIR? Let us do
Rietveld and be very careful to properly account for microabsorption..
Experimental RIRs are trash? theoretical RIRs do not represent at all any
reasonable experimental system? there is not error bar in RIR? Let us do
Rietveld and be very careful to properly account for microabsorption...
2015-06-11 4:18 GMT-03:00 Alan Hewat :
> Hi Leonid.
>
> I can't answer your qu
Hi Leonid.
I can't answer your question, but want to warn you that Gmail put your
email into my spam folder with the following explanation: "Why is this
message in Spam? It has a from address in yahoo.com but has failed yahoo.com's
required tests for authentication".
I don't understand Gmail's te
Dear Rietveldians,
Can anybody give an explanation of a severe discrepancy in the experimentally
measured Reference Intensity Ratios (RIR) and those calculated from structure
for some metals, such as Zn, Ti, Cd etc. in the ICDD PDF?
In particular for Zn, the experimental RIR from ICDD PDF 00-0
