Dear Mr. Werner,
this sounds for me like that there would be a problem in GSAS. If you
look to the formulas at page 155 of the GSAS manual, in all
trigonal/rhombohedral Laue groups there is no separate S004 for
rhombohedral settings (in fact S400 = S004). But for the hexagonal
settings (not
Dear Mr Leineweber
> actually I am wondering about your parameters. May it be that S310 is
> instead S301??
> If the former is the case, you use the hexagonal setting,
> which I would also expect if you use also the hexagonal setting for the
> crystal structure.
Thanks for your comment. I just
Dear Mr. Werner,
actually I am wondering about your parameters. May it be that S310 is
instead S301??
I cannot check it at them moment, because I haven't GSAS installed
currently. If the former is the case, you use the hexagonal setting,
which I would also expect if you use also the hexagonal
Phone: +7 3912 495663
Fax: +7 3912 238658
www.icct.ru/eng/content/persons/Sol_LA
***
--- On Sun, 10/26/08, Franz Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Franz Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: GSAS: Microstrain paramete
Hello All
Can anyone tell me how the indices of the S(hkl) parameters are treated in GSAS
in the case of a rhombohedral SG in hexagonal setting? Do the hkl refer to the
rhombohedral or hexagonal axes? I'm currently refining in SG R -3 (no. 148) in
hexagonal setting. Furthermore I'd like to know
