Re: [Rife-users] com.uwyn.rife.engine.wtf

2005-09-26 Thread Geert Bevin
That class implements GenericQueryManager On 26-sep-05, at 16:34, F Baube wrote: This is really weird, but it seems that a call to GenericQueryManagerFactory.getInstance (Datasource datasource, Class beanClass) is returning not a GenericQueryManager, but an instance of class com.uwyn.rif

Re: [Rife-users] com.uwyn.rife.engine.wtf

2005-09-26 Thread F Baube
This is really weird, but it seems that a call to GenericQueryManagerFactory.getInstance (Datasource datasource, Class beanClass) is returning not a GenericQueryManager, but an instance of class com.uwyn.rife.database.querymanagers.generic.databasedrivers.generic This is in Rife 1.0.

Re: [Rife-users] com.uwyn.rife.engine.wtf

2005-09-26 Thread Geert Bevin
Can you please paste the full stack trace again? On 26-sep-05, at 15:23, F Baube wrote: Surely sendmail reeled when thusly spake Geert Bevin: This is something in your code: Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException at wa.db.DBops.add(DBops.java:918) Oh sure. My code triggered something.

Re: [Rife-users] com.uwyn.rife.engine.wtf

2005-09-26 Thread F Baube
Surely sendmail reeled when thusly spake Geert Bevin: > > This is something in your code: > Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException > at wa.db.DBops.add(DBops.java:918) Oh sure. My code triggered something. But this particular error message does not come from my code, it comes from framework/

Re: [Rife-users] RIFE 1.1 released

2005-09-26 Thread F Baube
Surely sendmail reeled when thusly spake Geert Bevin: > > >Indeed. > > > >But in my case, I think unit testing won't reveal anything very > >helpful, since development and breakage is not so much within > >compilation units as in their interaction. There's testing > >frameworks like Selenium, but

Re: [Rife-users] RIFE 1.1 released

2005-09-26 Thread Geert Bevin
Indeed. But in my case, I think unit testing won't reveal anything very helpful, since development and breakage is not so much within compilation units as in their interaction. There's testing frameworks like Selenium, but Rife's capability can replace something like Selenium, if I understand i

Re: [Rife-users] RIFE 1.1 released

2005-09-26 Thread F Baube
Surely sendmail reeled when thusly spake Geert Bevin: > > The testing capability doesn't replace JUnit, TestNG or JTiger. > It adds the possibility to dynamically test RIFE applications > with any testing library without having to setup an embedded > servlet container. Indeed. But in my case,

Re: [Rife-users] RIFE 1.1 released

2005-09-26 Thread Geert Bevin
The testing capability doesn't replace JUnit, TestNG or JTiger. It adds the possibility to dynamically test RIFE applications with any testing library without having to setup an embedded servlet container. On 26-sep-05, at 12:05, F Baube wrote: The testing capability looks very nice. I was

Re: [Rife-users] RIFE 1.1 released

2005-09-26 Thread F Baube
The testing capability looks very nice. I was waiting for JUnit 4, but maybe you've made that unnecessary :) fred > Detailed release notes are available on: > http://rifers.org/blogs/gbevin/2005/9/26/rife_1_1_released > > The new version of RIFE can be downloaded directly from: > http://rif

[Rife-users] RIFE 1.1 released

2005-09-26 Thread Geert Bevin
RIFE 1.1 has been released. Below are the highlights: * Dual licensing under CDDL and LGPL * Detailed template error messages * Out-of-container testing framework Detailed release notes are available on: http://rifers.org/blogs/gbevin/2005/9/26/rife_1_1_released The new version of RIFE c