I would think that type=software && bgp_prefix = same (at least the same /24
and /48) would be a decent method to define similar.
- Jared
--
ripe-atlas mailing list
ripe-atlas@ripe.net
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/ripe-atlas
> On May 28, 2022, at 10:27 AM, Lukas Magauer via ripe-atlas
> wrote:
>
> Hi everybody!
>
> I have been running a Software probe on CentOS 8 since mid 2020. (and since
> switched it to Rocky Linux 8)
> It’s unsupported, but also didn’t really make any problems, just worked fine
> with the
> On Dec 10, 2020, at 12:29 PM, Ray Bellis wrote:
>
> Is there any RIPE policy about whether nodes that are subject to DNS
> interception should be excluded from results (or maybe even dropped
> altogether) ?
>
> While these probes are perhaps still useful for ping and traceroute
> tests, the
It’s pretty easy, if you login here:
https://atlas.ripe.net/user/credits/
It will tell you what you earn, eg (mine):
219,600.00 credits / hour
- Jared
> On May 20, 2020, at 9:05 AM, Michael J. Oghia wrote:
>
> Actually, I think I overstated my average monthly amount by quite a lot. It's
> n
Wondering if it makes sense to have a Debian and raspbian repo stood up for
this. I could easily add this to my clusters of raspi to make the coverage
broader.
Sent from my iCar
> On Feb 12, 2020, at 6:03 AM, Paul Eagles wrote:
>
> Great news!
>
> I'm having a few issues getting the Debian
I had written up instructions for the VM based anchor method of installing with
KVM/QEMU. You need to apply for an anchor and be approved and then set it up
for them. It's not that hard.
https://labs.ripe.net/Members/kistel/outcome-of-the-ripe-atlas-anchor-vms-pilot
Likely has the best info.
> On May 22, 2019, at 8:40 AM, Mayer Hans wrote:
>
>
>
> Dear All,
>
> Looking at the result of a traceroute measurement I see very often that first
> hop has a RFC1918 address.
> These days a found a result where the first 3 hops are showing something like
> 192.168.x.y
> Of course thi
> On Mar 6, 2019, at 7:21 AM, Hugh Saunders wrote:
>
> I see the big spenders are out in force today, anybody got an GBP for
> research?
>
> ;-)
If the payments are in atlas credits sure.
I also sent a few credits over as well.
- Jared
(Riches, I earn 273,600.00 credits / hour!)
I think it’s quite easy to get a VM these days as well, so the needs have
perhaps changed somewhat.
I know that hosting a VM anchor is a lot easier now, and people may have an
easier time hosting a VM than a probe in some cases.
- Jared
> On Feb 14, 2019, at 12:13 PM, James Gannon wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 16, 2019, at 1:18 PM, Christopher Morrow
> wrote:
>
> Howdy!
> I've been running a few measurements over the last while and looked at the
> raw results like:
>
> [{"dst_name":"2001:4860:4860::8844","error":{"socket":"connect failed Network
> is
> unreachable"},"from":"fd84:d527:5
Similarly happy to help.
- Jared
> On Dec 21, 2017, at 6:03 AM, Colin Johnston wrote:
>
> Happy to help with vm work as well if needed as I was one asking for VM probe
> functionality.
>
> Colin
>
>
>> On 21 Dec 2017, at 11:00, Mirjam Kuehne wrote:
>>
>> Dear colleagues,
>>
>> Members of
> On Nov 22, 2017, at 2:05 PM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 06:27:42PM +,
> Eduardo Duarte wrote
> a message of 289 lines which said:
>
>> When I got the results from the measurement they were not what I
>> expected The measurements to Quad9 had high value o
While doing some debugging of my home network, I noticed some odd queries from
the probe, namely this one:
02:28:36.921622 IP6 fe80::a2f3:c1ff:fec4:479f.51123 > 2001:558:feed::2.53:
23808+ A? 12920.atlas.ripe.net.b61065696c194ac3. (55)
Is this some captive portal/wildcarding detection, or perha
> On May 30, 2017, at 8:50 AM, Neal Daringer wrote:
>
> not sure if this is appropriate for the list or not, but I definitely am in
> the same boat. I don't use my credits and would love for them to be put to
> use.
>
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 8:23 AM, Michael Oghia wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I
> On May 26, 2017, at 12:42 PM, Roman Mamedov wrote:
>
> On Fri, 26 May 2017 14:51:49 +0300
> Marat Khalili wrote:
>
>> I have an interesting problem: I need some host that doesn't mind being
>> pinged but with several seconds of RTT (that's thousands milliseconds;
>> from Moscow, but it pro
I sent you some. Let me know if you need more.
Jared Mauch
> On Jan 13, 2017, at 6:20 AM, Max Mühlbronner wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> very kind of you, yes i am always in need of RIPE credits. Currently claiming
> the 1 million free credits every month, but also using it up
> On Aug 25, 2016, at 4:46 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 03:37:06PM +0100, Colin Johnston wrote:
>> maybe virtual vm probes might be useful
>
> You're not giving up on this, are you?
It’s way easier for me to spin up 25 virtual probes than 25 physical ones :)
Hoping tha
We are attempting to test some things and I’m getting this error.
"A one-off measurement cannot have the interval field set”
It seems to be a problem if this field is even blank, anyone else experience
this?
- Jared
I will hand out 10m credits to folks who email me a proper address.
Jared Mauch
> On May 18, 2016, at 8:19 AM, Boris Fersing wrote:
>
> Hi Rafal,
>
> I can also donate some credits, let me know.
>
> Boris
>
> May 18 2016 8:09 AM, "Marat Khalili" wrote
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 12:25:19PM +0100, Robert Kisteleki wrote:
> (Excuse me for the belated answer -- I'm picking up topics that were not
> answered by us or the community.)
>
> On 2015-12-09 20:00, Jared Mauch wrote:
> > Is there a way to schedule a one-off test on a
> On Dec 10, 2015, at 6:21 AM, Philip Homburg wrote:
>
> On 2015/12/10 10:11 , Willem Toorop wrote:
>> And sending arbitrary EDNS0 options? Have you ever considered that too?
>> Is it on the todo list too?
>
> Hi Willem,
>
> Just about all EDNS0 options take parameters. It is not part of the
> On Dec 9, 2015, at 2:39 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>
>> I'd like to request the ability to have RIPE Atlas probes be able to issue
>> DNS queries for arbitrary record types, and have that capability exposed in
>> the API. I'm particularly interested in newer DANE record types like TLSA,
>> OPENPGPK
Is there a way to schedule a one-off test on all the probes to be run “at a
leisurely pace”, eg: looking up a specific DNS QNAME?
(I’ll call it a lazy query/scheduling).
- Jared
> On Dec 9, 2015, at 1:38 PM, Klaus Darilion
> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> When scheduling checks I often get the error: "We do not allow more than
> 10 concurrent measurements to the same target."
>
> Imo this is not correct. Yes, I do schedule more then 10 measurements to
> the same target, but they
Wish i were there.. There’s some cool ways to detect this externally that I
know some researchers are working on documenting. I think their results
will be at NDSS or PAM (i forget which).
- Jared
> On Nov 17, 2015, at 12:03 PM, Pavel Odintsov wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> Thanks for answer!
>
> But
Or you can ask me for credits. I transfer credits to people who ask. My
credit cup runneth over.
- Jared
> On Nov 9, 2015, at 8:02 AM, Oliver Haake wrote:
>
> Thank you Robert, that sounds awesome.
> Keep up the good work.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Oliver
>
>
>
>
>
> On 09.11.2015 13:27, Robert
26 matches
Mail list logo