Hi, Brian
Brian wrote:
> I think it's clear that, in future the involvement of NCC staff in
> the NomCom (other than agreed secretariat roles) should be
> severely limited
[...]
> and there should be consideration given to limits or grace
> periods or the like where someone has been working
75301. CRA No. 20036270
From: Andy Davidson
Sent: Wednesday 27 May 2020 16:21
To: Brian Nisbet
Cc: RIPE list
Subject: Re: [ripe-list] The NomCom Requests your Support
CAUTION[External]: This email originated from outside of the or
Hi, Jim
> On 28/05/2020, 06:58, "Jim Reid" wrote:
> > On 27 May 2020, at 16:21, Andy Davidson wrote:
> > If governance is improved by seeing the Community and NCC separation in the
> > work of our
> > committees then let's have that improvement fo
Hans Petter wrote:
> your input is highly appreciated.
The RIPE meeting is usually quite good for remote-attendance options, but since
everyone was remote for '80, the setup was *excellent*. Thank you for that.
It was great to be able to relay questions through the chairs into sessions but
Hi,
HPH wrote:
> I do want to acknowledge that concerns were raised quite late in the process
> about the potential for
> capture or influence by the RIPE NCC.
The Nomcom, chaired by the founder of the RIPE NCC has appointed a RIPE NCC
staffer as the community Chair. This had to be done on
Hi, Benedikt, everyone
On 04/07/2020, 12:57, Benedikt Stockebrand wrote:
> Andy Davidson writes:
>> HPH wrote:
>>> I do want to acknowledge that concerns were raised quite late in the
>>> process about the potential for capture or influence by the RIPE NCC.
&
On 7 Feb 2021, at 13:05, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ripe-list
wrote:
> ("Ensure Neutrality of PDP Appeals Procedure”)
Hi, Jordi, all
On your policy proposal: Is this something the Arbiters [0] could do well?
Andy
[0] http://ripe.net/about-us/legal/arbitration/list-of-arbiters
ity plans, budgets, or hiring decisions. Can this be
captured in the lovely succinct way that you have approached the first two
drafts?
I recognise your effort in putting together this document, it is not a simple
undertaking to author governance material.
Andy Davidson
--
To unsubscribe from thi
On 20 Jan 2024, at 21:06, Leo Vegoda wrote:
>
> I disagree. They are equally important. RIPE Database searches obviously need
> to be highly accessible but the site search is vital as the site is so big
> and old stuff is never removed. I look forward to a really good website
> search feature
