RonM wrote:
> So, it seems something wonky was happening with Squeeze Control. I just
> went to the web interface and the sort was fine, as disc#/track#. I then
> went back to Squeeze Control and the sort was fine there as well.
> Perhaps I had been hallucinating.
>
> Or, more likely, I had
So, it seems something wonky was happening with Squeeze Control. I just
went to the web interface and the sort was fine, as disc#/track#. I then
went back to Squeeze Control and the sort was fine there as well.
Perhaps I had been hallucinating.
Or, more likely, I had turned on shuffle and
RonM wrote:
> I would actually be happy to treat multidisk albums as a single album.
> All album titles are the same; all have the disc number set correctly
> (albeit with the disc total, as in 1/5). I wouldn't think that latter
> would make a difference.
>
> However, in the standard LMS front
After losing a track from disc 1 in a multi disc set because the studio
version was at the same position on disc 1 as a live version on disc 2 I
have changed dbpa settings slightly. In case you are wondering both
tracks had identical names so the disc 2 rip overwrote the disc 1 file.
I now have
garym wrote:
> late to the party on this, but to summarize what I do for multidisk
> sets.
>
> 1. In dbpa ripping, I make sure album title is the same for all discs,
> and use the disc numbering tag (1, 2, 3, 4, etc.). I do not use the
> disc total tag (there is a setting in dbpa to not use
v2k wrote:
> They are, which is where the confusion sets in.
>
> I've been cleaning up a lot of tags since installing LMS (years in the
> making) and have noticed that changes sometimes goes halfway trough or
> cause odd results until the library is refreshed a few times. Anyways I
> have them
slartibartfast wrote:
> Are the album title tags exactly the same for both discs in the 2 disc
> sets?
They are, which is where the confusion sets in.
I've been cleaning up a lot of tags since installing LMS (years in the
making) and have noticed that changes sometimes goes halfway trough or
late to the party on this, but to summarize what I do for multidisk
sets.
1. In dbpa ripping, I make sure album title is the same for all discs,
and use the disc numbering tag (1, 2, 3, 4, etc.). I do not use the
disc total tag (there is a setting in dbpa to not use this).
2. In LMS I have
v2k wrote:
> The "album grouping" function seems to be a bit, um... selective. I
> changed it to show multiple sets as separate albums after failing to
> figure out why LMS grouped some of them differently. It is not as neat
> now but hopefully my sanity will keep a bit longer.
> I had three
The "album grouping" function seems to be a bit, um... selective. I
changed it to show multiple sets as separate albums after failing to
figure out why LMS grouped some of them differently. It is not as neat
now but hopefully my sanity will keep a bit longer. I had three albums
giving me
My own personal preference is to put the disc number explicitly in the
album title bc I like to see one artwork per cd. If it's a two cd set I
do it like this:
The Wall (CD1)
The Wall (CD2)
If it's 3 or more I do it like this:
Crossroads (Disc 1)
...
Crossroads (Disc 4)
This is of course an
I use the Disc# tag on my multi-disk albums and for file names on
multi-disc sets I name the files [disc#] [track#] [song title]. This way
they also show correctly in file manager.
Main system - Rock Solid with LMS 8.1.2 on WHS 2011 - 2 Duets and
Squeeseslave
Cabin system - Rock solid with
RonM wrote:
> If there was an option to treat them as sequential parts of a single
> long album, that would work; the problem is that even though the switch
> is apparently to not treat the discs as separate albums, the sequencing
> doesn't work well, with multiples of each track number. If
If there was an option to treat them as sequential parts of a single
long album, that would work; the problem is that even though the switch
is apparently to not treat the discs as separate albums, the sequencing
doesn't work well, with multiples of each track number. If they were
listed as a
RonM wrote:
> Yes, I suspected that.
>
> But the big question is how I get LMS to see the separate disc numbers
> as separate albums. As of now, despite having that tag, they are all
> coming up in a single list, all five discs combined. There must be a
> way.
>
> R.If you want all multi disc
Yes, I suspected that.
But the big question is how I get LMS to see the separate disc numbers
as separate albums. As of now, despite having that tag, they are all
coming up in a single list, all five discs combined. There must be a
way.
R.
LMS on a dedicated server (FitPC3)
Transporter
RonM wrote:
> Refresh my memory, I can't find the thread that I know addresses this.
>
> I have a box set (Joni Mitchell Archives Vol. 1), and am ripping it with
> dBpoweramp. The titles of each disc come up as identical, and that's
> fine. However, no disc numbering defaults in, they are all
Refresh my memory, I can't find the thread that I know addresses this.
I have a box set (Joni Mitchell Archives Vol. 1), and am ripping it with
dBpoweramp. The titles of each disc come up as identical, and that's
fine. However, no disc numbering defaults in, they are all 1/1. I want
to use 1/5,
18 matches
Mail list logo
