1. You really seems to mean your use case and think your use case is
representative for a majority a common fallacy its your bias in this
. But it is an opinion one can have so ok .
2. Does it matters at all ? All tag and rip software I used gives you
the power to add any tag you like for
DJanGo wrote:
> wait .. you didnt say anything wrong but you typed a lot and if your
> unable to see our answers where we already prooved your bullsh1t i cant
> help you and i wont.
> last order last word i am out of fish
actually, i proved you wrong. u misunderstood and continue to
d6jg wrote:
> That is just not true. All ripping software uses some online database or
> other to get its tags. If the online database contains the wrong tags so
> will the resulting files.
ok, this is getting annoying. you completely missed the point of what i
was saying.
first of all, i
d6jg wrote:
> I repeat you are wrong. I have ripped CDs using iTunes (Windows & Mac),
> XLD, EAC, DbPoweramp, as well as the Linux ripper/tagged in Vortexboxe.
> I have never manually created any Compilation tags but lo and behold I
> have some albums where such tags exist. Where did they come
d6jg wrote:
> I didnt say EAC specifically did at any point. I know it doesnt.
good lord. to wit:
d6jg wrote:
> I repeat you are wrong. I have ripped CDs using iTunes (Windows & Mac),
> XLD, *EAC,* DbPoweramp, as well as the Linux ripper/tagged in
> Vortexboxe. I have never manually
dolodobendan wrote:
> 1. BROWSABLE TAGS:
>
>
>
> 2. SUBMENUS
>
> Maybe 2) is already possible with LibraryDemo?
i like these ideas, and have np with/support them. can't speak to the
plugin, b/c i haven't used it, (or Erlands). i think it would be good
to see what other classical users
dolodobendan wrote:
> Yes. I never rely on some online tags. There's always something wrong
> with it. Always.
when i rip something, (mainly with EAC), i get the fields filled in by
the online DBs, and then i edit them to correct them if necessary prior
to the rip. this has been the case for
BJW wrote:
> ok, this is getting annoying. you completely missed the point of what i
> was saying.
>
> first of all, i already said servers job is not to expect perfection,
> that of course garbage in will = garbage out.
>
> the point i am making above, which is 100% true and not refuted by
DJanGo wrote:
> please please do not wrote something like thes unprooved and wrong
> things again...
>
> Do your 'homework' (https://discussions.apple.com/thread/2483651)
>
> Since my old employer is a audio content provider, i do know how things
> work eg. if you are in the gracenote content
DJanGo wrote:
> You know that itunes integration sometimes broke, cause itunes had
> changed?
> You know that f*#!1ng Compilation Tag is a Itunes "Gummick"?
yes, i'm well aware that comp tags, which server relies heavily on, are
an apple fudge. at this point, does it matter? comp tags are in
BJW wrote:
> but just to be clear, that all has nothing to do with the fact, that
> most rippers don't assign comp tags at all (as part of the ripping
> process).
please please do not wrote something like thes unprooved and wrong
things again...
Do your 'homework'
d6jg wrote:
> I didnt say EAC specifically did at any point. I know it doesnt.
> You on the other hand have said that MOST dont. I disagree. iTunes
> does. XLD does. The ripper in Vortexbox does. DbPoweramp (the paid
> version) allows you to choose before you rip. It is the only software
>
BJW wrote:
> so now i'm a troll? what exactly did i say that was wrong? please, be
> specific, SHOW ME.
> \snip
> /snap
> what i said is FACT. not subjective, not an opinion, not up for
> debate.
wait .. you didnt say anything wrong but you typed a lot and if your
unable to see our answers
BJW wrote:
> good lord. to wit:
>
>
>
> see the BOLD above. come on man, knock it off.
>
>
>
> wow, where to begin?
>
> first of all, i never said server shouldn't use comp tags! i never
> would say such a stupid thing. i have been arguing for a pref to turn
> automatic VA logic
BJW wrote:
> i know what you're saying, but i don't agree... many major rippers,
> like WMP, winamp, EAC, etc... will tag without setting comp tags. this
> is a common scenario that is to be expected. the job isn't to expect
> perfection, the job is to expect highly likely scenarios.
>
>
DJanGo wrote:
>
> again its techie... but LibraryDemo is a very nice thing - my child
> loves the things i do with that.
I don't care about techie. :) Would you post your modifications here?
Btw., what's the main difference between this library plugin and
Additional Browse Modes? If both
16 matches
Mail list logo
