While this is no doubt a big headache and a ton of work for Tim, and I
empathize, this is also a very good discussion to help others avoid this.
I think this would make for a great page on the Wiki to have some of these
suggested measures available for everyone to have ready access to.
I only am
Crazy idea to follow...
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 11:37 AM Fred Gleason
wrote:
snip
>
> So, just saying “Interfacing with Windows isn’t supported” isn’t in the
> cards if you expect to be an actually relevant, viable option in Broadcast
> Automation.
>
Well, there's a good chance it is crazy...
On Dec 15, 2021, at 23:51, Brian wrote:
> One more thought... Samba is Open Source, and I think you could make a case
> that mature, established, widely-used open source software is generally less
> exploitable than widely-used proprietary software of any age. The reason for
> this being the
On Dec 15, 2021, at 23:43, Brian wrote:
> I'm not sure this conclusion follows from the premises. Samba on *nix is a
> totally independent implementation of the SMB/CIFS protocols that shares
> nothing in common with the MS implementations. 99.9% of the time
> vulnerabilities like the one
