Re: [Rkhunter-users] R: Re: checkall option?

2016-03-22 Thread John Horne
On Tue, 2016-03-22 at 14:52 +0100, absolutely_f...@libero.it wrote: > Hi John, > > thank you for your reply. > So, basically, the difference between: > > RKHUNTER_FLAGS="--checkall --skip-keypress --nocolors --quiet -- > appendlog --display-logfile" > > RKHUNTER_FLAGS="--cronjob --nocolors --rep

[Rkhunter-users] R: Re: checkall option?

2016-03-22 Thread absolutely_f...@libero.it
Hi John, thank you for your reply. So, basically, the difference between: RKHUNTER_FLAGS="--checkall --skip-keypress --nocolors --quiet --appendlog -- display-logfile" RKHUNTER_FLAGS="--cronjob --nocolors --report-warnings-only" doesn't affect the number of tests, but only report, correct? Tha

Re: [Rkhunter-users] checkall option?

2016-03-22 Thread John Horne
On Tue, 2016-03-22 at 09:53 +0100, absolutely_f...@libero.it wrote: > Hi, > I am using Rkhunter 1.4.0 on CentOS 5 (rpm from Sourceforge). > > This package puts a cron in /etc/cron.daily/rkhunter with this line: > > .. > .. >  RKHUNTER_FLAGS="--checkall --skip-keypress --nocolors --quiet -- > appe

[Rkhunter-users] checkall option?

2016-03-22 Thread absolutely_f...@libero.it
Hi,I am using Rkhunter 1.4.0 on CentOS 5 (rpm from Sourceforge). This package puts a cron in /etc/cron.daily/rkhunter with this line: RKHUNTER_FLAGS="--checkall --skip-keypress --nocolors --quiet --appendlog --display-logfile" I don't find any reference to "--checkall", is it an official