Re: [Rkhunter-users] Hidden process

2013-08-02 Thread Yago Jesus
oot > > However, processes 17106 and 17149 are not present. > Do you think I've a security problem? > Best regards > > > > > Messaggio originale---- > Da: yje...@security-projects.com > Data: 29/07/2013 13.18 > A: "absolutely_f...@libero.it" &

Re: [Rkhunter-users] Hidden process

2013-07-29 Thread Yago Jesus
Hi, I think this message comes from unhide. To verify it, go to your system, and run -as root- #unhide sys And watch for messages. If you find again the same PID, probably you have a problem. If not, this could be a transitory process and you can not worry about it 2013/7/29 absolutely_f...@l

[Rkhunter-users] Hidden process

2013-07-29 Thread absolutely_f...@libero.it
Hi, I received this alert in rkhunter's mail: Warning: Hidden processes found: Found HIDDEN PID: 9333 " ... maybe a transitory process" When I logged on the server, the process was no longer there. How can I diagnose this alert? In /var/log/rkhunter.log I've no further details. Thank

Re: [Rkhunter-users] Hidden process continuously modifying files

2011-09-26 Thread unspawn
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:17:05 +0200 Micky L Martin wrote: >Already did lsof and process tracing but to no avail. Does anyone have any idea how to find that culprit process? Wanting to mitigate the situation by modifying the system is understandable but not a best practice as you would be removi

[Rkhunter-users] Hidden process continuously modifying files

2011-09-26 Thread Micky L Martin
For the binary experts. I have a situation here. Something hideously but continuously is modifying the /bin/ executables as common as coreutils and net-tools. I can verify that from md5sum. First thing I checked was 'ls' and it has a checksum mismatch. So I removed it and reinstalled it. Then I mo

Re: [Rkhunter-users] hidden process false positives

2010-03-11 Thread unspawn
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:27:56 +0100 William Maddler wrote: >The point is that smtp and lmtp aren't supposed to be hidden processes :) Then (unless anyone can confirm this is OK behaviour) please check: - '\ps axfwwwe' output for all Postfix processes and check their UID and GID matches, - 'lso

Re: [Rkhunter-users] hidden process false positives

2010-03-11 Thread William Maddler
On 03/11/2010 10:46 PM, unsp...@hushmail.com wrote: > On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:34:24 +0100 William Maddler > wrote: >> since about a week I'm getting alerts about hidden processes found > on my system (Debian 5.0 stable 32bit). >> >> I've just found that reported PIDs are Postfix (2.5.5-1.1) ltmp

Re: [Rkhunter-users] hidden process false positives

2010-03-11 Thread unspawn
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:34:24 +0100 William Maddler wrote: >since about a week I'm getting alerts about hidden processes found on my system (Debian 5.0 stable 32bit). > >I've just found that reported PIDs are Postfix (2.5.5-1.1) ltmp and smtp mail delivery processes. >Any clue? If those proces

[Rkhunter-users] hidden process false positives

2010-03-10 Thread William Maddler
Hello all, since about a week I'm getting alerts about hidden processes found on my system (Debian 5.0 stable 32bit). I've just found that reported PIDs are Postfix (2.5.5-1.1) ltmp and smtp mail delivery processes. nopal:/var/log# rkhunter --version Rootkit Hunter 1.3.6 Any clue? Thx William