Hi Michael,
Thanks for your reply. Even updating the rkhunter version to the latest
1.2.9. Am facing the same problem. Even though i followed the steps
mentioned in report. I used the command rkhunter --update to fix this
problem.Please give some suggestion to solve this problem.
Below is the
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 12:59 +0530, thirupathy k wrote:
Thanks for your reply. Even updating the rkhunter version to the
latest 1.2.9. Am facing the same problem. Even though i followed the
steps mentioned in report. I used the command rkhunter --update to
fix this problem.Please give some
Hello Rickj,
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 13:53:41 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a very old webserver running apache 1.3.31 on Red Hat
Linux 7.3.
(..) We recently discovered a rootkit on the server trying
establish a
connection to 66.192.67.170 on port 4096.
I've tried searching for the pl
Could you help. What is the explanation for this message.
Francisco
-Mensagem original-
De: Cron Daemon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada em: quinta-feira, 21 de junho de 2007 23:03
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto: Cron [EMAIL PROTECTED] run-parts /etc/cron.daily
Just a FYI, I get these false positives consitently on a
Etch Debian system.
Thanks
Scanning for hidden files... [ Warning! ]
-
Found warnings:
[06:25:25] WARNING, found: /dev/.static (directory)
/dev/.udev (directory)
* Application version scan
- GnuPG 2.0.3 [ Unknown ]
- PHP 5.2.3 [ Unknown ]
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML.
Hi there I work for hentaikey.com as there IT Security Consultant
i dont know if this hash is for real or not
but i got a BAD hit on
/usr/bin/file [ BAD ]
6b650430f01971c16a7cad41d44b1bd3
i dont think its realy anything bad
the file does not seem to be anything fishy
we are
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 22:07:01 +0200 project 2501
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i dont know if this hash is for real or not
Verify using installed file integrity checker or the distro's
package management tools.
i dont think its realy anything bad
the file does not seem to be anything fishy
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 00:35:54 +0200 Jeff Peeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Minor detail, but I think you'll need a -p before the PID. lsof -
w -n -p PID
Actually *not* so minor a detail. Thanks for adding!
Cheers, unSpawn
--
Turn your passion into a profession. Click here to find a film school
