On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 01:10:52 +0100 John Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Although I don't see anything wrong in /var/log/prelink.log.
> > I wonder whether hashes I send a week ago were incorporated.
>
> Yes they were. However they were for FC5 x86_64, and the OP didn't say
> whether he used a
t 2006 01:25:00 +0100 From: John Horne <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Rkhunter-users] Problem with MD5 hash on Fedora
> Core 5 To: rkhunter-users@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain On Sat, 2006-10-07 at 10:46 +0200, Andy
On Sat, 2006-10-07 at 10:46 +0200, Andy Esten wrote:
> Yesterday I received an update (2006100500) of the file defaulthashes.dat.
> This file now contains hashes for Fedora Core 5. But almost every hash is
> BAD. I know for sure my system is not compromised and the files are correct.
>
> Can som
On Sat, 2006-10-07 at 15:47 +0300, Nerijus Baliunas wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 10:46:37 +0200 Andy Esten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Yesterday I received an update (2006100500) of the file defaulthashes.dat.
> > This file now contains hashes for Fedora Core 5. But almost every hash is
> >
I have the same problem this morning. I am running 1.2.8 as a daily cron
but also have
1.2.9 installed locally (hoping for a 1.2.9 rpm). ran hashupd.sh and ran
both versions
again with the same results.
Hashes have been OK until today, and
everything else says ok or clean or no change. If you wou
On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 10:46:37 +0200 Andy Esten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yesterday I received an update (2006100500) of the file defaulthashes.dat.
> This file now contains hashes for Fedora Core 5. But almost every hash is
> BAD. I know for sure my system is not compromised and the files are c
Yesterday I received an update (2006100500) of the file defaulthashes.dat.
This file now contains hashes for Fedora Core 5. But almost every hash is
BAD. I know for sure my system is not compromised and the files are correct.
Can somebody confirm that there are problems with the Fedora Core 5 ha
