Re: [rkward-devel] static windows binary

2010-05-16 Thread Thomas Friedrichsmeier
Hi, On Sunday 16 May 2010, Prasenjit Kapat wrote: > OK, the file is too big to be installable! indeed. I had created the last version on Linux (after changing some last details of the Readme.html), and had not tested unpacking after that. I have now 7zip'ped it on windows, and this time it work

Re: [rkward-devel] static windows binary

2010-05-15 Thread Prasenjit Kapat
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote: > Hi, > > ok, the "installation bundle" is now available from > http://sourceforge.net/projects/rkwardextras/files/ . Could some of you please > give this a try, before I start linking to this from the RKWard on Windows > page? OK, th

Re: [rkward-devel] static windows binary

2010-05-15 Thread Thomas Friedrichsmeier
Hi, On Thursday 13 May 2010, Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote: > With a bit of luck, I'll get this done tomorrow, or at > least over the weekend. ok, the "installation bundle" is now available from http://sourceforge.net/projects/rkwardextras/files/ . Could some of you please give this a try, befo

Re: [rkward-devel] static windows binary

2010-05-13 Thread Thomas Friedrichsmeier
Hi, On Thursday 13 May 2010, meik michalke wrote: > yes, that's much less than downloading all the KDE-base packages alone. > btw., does the installer have an unistall feature yet? the (current) rkward installer? No, and it would be quite difficult to add one. NSIS, which we use to create does

Re: [rkward-devel] static windows binary

2010-05-13 Thread meik michalke
hi, am Donnerstag 13 Mai 2010 (10:56) schrieb Thomas Friedrichsmeier: > Packed into a self-extracting archive with 7zip this comes down to ~129MB, > which isn't all that bad, IMO. yes, that's much less than downloading all the KDE-base packages alone. btw., does the installer have an unistall fe

Re: [rkward-devel] static windows binary

2010-05-13 Thread Thomas Friedrichsmeier
Hi, an update on this: On Saturday 08 May 2010, Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote: > Well a live CD would be pretty cool. However I think the most exciting > option is to simply provide a self-extracting archive that contains a > complete installation of RKWard, kdebase, and R (with R2HTML, and perh

Re: [rkward-devel] static windows binary

2010-05-08 Thread Thomas Friedrichsmeier
Hi, On Saturday 08 May 2010, Prasenjit Kapat wrote: > I am just "thinking out loud" now: For windows split rkward into three > parts: > > 1. Core rkward which will have a special config file. The config file > will provide the path to KDE, R folders. I think this is already in > place. > 2. Prov

Re: [rkward-devel] static windows binary

2010-05-08 Thread Thomas Friedrichsmeier
Hi, On Wednesday 05 May 2010, meik michalke wrote: > now that i've toyed around with the windows version a little (nice to see > that rkward can be run from a network share and even a DVD without > installation), i was wondering if a static build was possible. > > the needed kdebase installatio

Re: [rkward-devel] static windows binary

2010-05-07 Thread Prasenjit Kapat
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 5:32 PM, meik michalke wrote: > > now that i've toyed around with the windows version a little (nice to see that > rkward can be run from a network share and even a DVD without installation), i > was wondering if a static build was possible. This is a really interesting ide

Re: [rkward-devel] static windows binary

2010-05-06 Thread mat
meik michalke a écrit : > hi, > > now that i've toyed around with the windows version a little (nice to see > that > rkward can be run from a network share and even a DVD without installation), > i > was wondering if a static build was possible. > > the needed kdebase installation consumes arou

[rkward-devel] static windows binary

2010-05-05 Thread meik michalke
hi, now that i've toyed around with the windows version a little (nice to see that rkward can be run from a network share and even a DVD without installation), i was wondering if a static build was possible. the needed kdebase installation consumes around 700 MB of disk space, and i doubt that