Hi,
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Thomas Friedrichsmeier
wrote:
>
> Thus, I am rather reluctant to do this. I would assume that duplicate column
> names are a rare exception, and so we can afford not to support them 100%. Do
> you think they are important enough as a use-case to make a better
Hi,
On Sunday 26 September 2010, Prasenjit Kapat wrote:
> Recent updates to the data editor do not display the column number,
> which, to me is helpful at times. So, why not internally always use
> the column number and use the column names only for displaying?
> Although transformations like sort
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 7:45 AM, Thomas Friedrichsmeier
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thursday 23 September 2010, Stefan Rödiger wrote:
>> > It should be mostly, but not entirely safe to edit such objects. If you
>> > edit a cell in one of the duplicate columns, all columns with the same
>> > name will
Hi,
On Thursday 23 September 2010, Stefan Rödiger wrote:
> > It should be mostly, but not entirely safe to edit such objects. If you
> > edit a cell in one of the duplicate columns, all columns with the same
> > name will be affected in the backend. However, in the editor, this will
> > not become
Am Dienstag 21 September 2010, 16:52:04 schrieb Thomas Friedrichsmeier:
> Hi,
>
> On Sunday 19 September 2010, Prasenjit Kapat wrote:
> > As a caution to the user: Should a warning be displayed when the data
> > editor encounters multiple columns with same name? Noting that, the
> > data itself is
Hi,
On Sunday 19 September 2010, Prasenjit Kapat wrote:
> As a caution to the user: Should a warning be displayed when the data
> editor encounters multiple columns with same name? Noting that, the
> data itself is not lost, it is just not displayed and hence not safe
> to be edited! (Or is it saf
Hi,
On Sunday 19 September 2010, Prasenjit Kapat wrote:
> Here is something that I found interesting. Consider the last two
> lines of Stefan's Procedure.txt:
>
> data <- data.frame (
> names (data) <- c(...
>
> The crash is deterministic after you run these two lines individually
> (ie, "Ru
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Thomas Friedrichsmeier
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thursday 16 September 2010, Stefan Rödiger wrote:
>> BTW, as you might consent the lines attached in my example are not a good
>> example how to work with R (size and arrangement of data ...). Thus it was
>> really in
Hi,
On Thursday 16 September 2010, Stefan Rödiger wrote:
> BTW, as you might consent the lines attached in my example are not a good
> example how to work with R (size and arrangement of data ...). Thus it was
> really interesting for me to see what happens ... .
I think the crucial thing in your
Am Donnerstag 16 September 2010, 17:14:49 schrieb Prasenjit Kapat:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 8:22 AM, "Stefan Rödiger"
>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have two files attached. First is called procedure.txt with the
> > description how to preduce the potential bug. And there is also the gdb
> > mess
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 8:22 AM, "Stefan Rödiger"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have two files attached. First is called procedure.txt with the
> description how to preduce the potential bug. And there is also the gdb
> message. I was able to reproduce the crash of RKWard multiple times by doing
> this.
Con
11 matches
Mail list logo
